Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30824979›Full record

ReviewKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2019

The use of allograft tissue in posterior cruciate, collateral and multi-ligament knee reconstruction.

Marc Jacob Strauss, Ricardo Varatojo, Tarek Boutefnouchet, Vincenzo Condello, Kristian Samuelsson, Pablo E Gelber, Paolo Adravanti, Lior Laver, Sigbjorn Dimmen, Karl Eriksson and 2 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Controversies in acute multiligamentary knee injuries (MLKI).Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2020
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Allografts in joint reconstruction: ESSKA making a difference.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Marc Jacob StraussSteadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, CO, USA.
Ricardo VaratojoHospital Cuf Descobertas, Rua Mário Botas, Lisbon, Portugal.
Tarek BoutefnouchetUniversity Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Clifford Bridge Road, Coventry, UK.
Vincenzo CondelloDepartment of Orthopaedics, Clinica Humanitas Castelli, Via Mazzini, 11, Bergamo, Italy.
Kristian SamuelssonSahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden.
Pablo E GelberHospital de la Santa Creu I Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Paolo AdravantiOrthopaedic Department, Città di Parma Clinic, Piazzale Athos Maestri 5, Parma, Italy.
Lior LaverUniversity Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Clifford Bridge Road, Coventry, UK.
Sigbjorn DimmenLovisenberg Diaconal Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Karl ErikssonStockholm South Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Peter VerdonkAntwerp Orthopedic Center, Monica Hospitals, Antwerp, Belgium.
Tim SpaldingUniversity Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Clifford Bridge Road, Coventry, UK. tim.spalding@uhcw.nhs.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9856-8387

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCurrently both autograft and allograft tissues are available for reconstruction of posterior cruciate, collateral and multi-ligament knee injuries. Decision-making is based on a complex interplay between anatomical structures, functional bundles and varying biomechanical requirements. Despite theoretically better biological healing and reduced risk of disease transmission autografts are associated with donor site morbidity as well as being limited by size and quantity. The use of allografts eliminates donor-site morbidity but raises cost and issues of clinical effectiveness. The purpose of this paper is to review current concepts and evidence for the use of allografts in primary posterior cruciate, collateral and multi-ligament reconstructions.

methodsA narrative review of the relevant literature was conducted for PCL, collateral ligament and multi-ligament knee reconstruction. Studies were identified using a targeted and systematic search with focus on recent comparative studies and all clinical systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The rationale and principles of management underpinning the role of allograft tissue were identified and the clinical and functional outcomes were analysed. Finally, the position of postoperative physiotherapy and rehabilitation was identified.

resultsThe review demonstrated paucity in high quality and up-to-date results addressing the issue especially on collaterals and multi-ligament reconstructions. There was no significant evidence of superiority of a graft type over another for PCL reconstruction. Contemporary principles in the management of posterolateral corner, MCL and multi-ligament injuries support the use of allograft tissue.

conclusionThe present review demonstrates equivalent clinical results with the use of autografts or allografts. It remains, however, difficult to generate a conclusive evidence-based approach due to the paucity of high-level research. When confronted by the need for combined reconstructions with multiple grafts, preservation of synergistic muscles, and adapted postoperative rehabilitation; the current evidence does offer support for the use of allograft tissue. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Indexed as

AllograftsAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionBone-Patellar Tendon-Bone GraftingCollateral LigamentsHumansKnee InjuriesPatient Outcome AssessmentPosterior Cruciate LigamentPostoperative CareTendonsAllograftsAutograftsCollateral ligamentsDecision-makingGraft choiceMultiligamentsPosterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.