Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30824439›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2019

The Indoor-Air Microbiota of Pig Farms Drives the Composition of the Pig Farmers' Nasal Microbiota in a Season-Dependent and Farm-Specific Manner.

Julia G Kraemer, Susanne Aebi, Anne Oppliger, Markus Hilty

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. WORKbiota: A Systematic Review about the Effects of Occupational Exposure on Microbiota and Workers' Health.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Julia G KraemerInstitute for Infectious Diseases, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Susanne AebiInstitute for Infectious Diseases, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Anne OppligerCenter for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Markus HiltyInstitute for Infectious Diseases, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland Markus.Hilty@ifik.unibe.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-2418-6474
University of Bern · CHCentre universitaire de médecine générale et santé publique, Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prior studies have demonstrated an influence of the built environment on the human nasal microbiota. However, very little is known about the influences of working on a pig farm on the human nasal microbiota. We longitudinally collected samples from 30 pig farms (air and nasal swabs from humans and pigs) in Switzerland from 2014 to 2015. As controls, nasal swabs from cow farmers and individuals with no contact with farm animals were included. An analysis of the microbiota for all samples (

Indexed as

Air MicrobiologyFarmersMicrobiotaAnimalsBacteriaEswatiniFarmsHumansNoseRNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSeasonsSus scrofaRNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16Sairborne microbiotanasal microbiotaoccupational exposurepig farmersseasonal variation

Identifiers

PMID30824439
PMCPMC6495764
OpenAlexW2915926980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.