Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30823877›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2019

Factor structure of the Quality of Children's Palliative Care Instrument (QCPCI) when complete by parents of children with cancer.

Kimberley Widger, Sarah Brennenstuhl, Jacqueline Duc, Ann Tourangeau, Adam Rapoport

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kimberley WidgerLawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, 130-155 College Street, Toronto, ON, M5T 1P8, Canada. kim.widger@utoronto.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8132-061X
Sarah BrennenstuhlLawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, 130-155 College Street, Toronto, ON, M5T 1P8, Canada.
Jacqueline DucPaediatric Palliative Care Service, Lady Cilento Children's Hospital, Stanley Street, South Brisbane, QLD, 4101, Australia.
Ann TourangeauLawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, 130-155 College Street, Toronto, ON, M5T 1P8, Canada.
Adam RapoportPaediatric Advanced Care Team, Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrently available indicators of quality pediatric palliative care tend to focus on care provided during the end-of-life period rather than care provided throughout the disease trajectory. We adapted a previously developed instrument focused on mothers' perspectives on the quality of end-of-life care and assessed its psychometric properties with mothers and fathers of children with cancer at any stage of the illness.

methodsFour subscales were included in the analysis: Connect with Families, Involve Parents, Share Information Among Health Professionals, Support Siblings. The number of items across the four subscales was reduced from 31 to 15. We conducted confirmatory factor analysis, composite reliability, internal consistency, and tests of correlation between the overall scale and subscale totals and a separate question inquiring about overall quality of care. Measurement invariance between mothers and fathers was assessed.

resultsA total of 533 mothers and fathers completed the survey. The four-factor model was confirmed and there were significant correlations between each subscale score and responses to the overall item on care quality. Cronbach's alpha was adequate for the scale as a whole and for each subscale ranging from 0.78 to 0.90. We also found the factor structure, means, and intercepts were similar across mothers and fathers, suggesting the tool can be used by both groups.

conclusionsThere is evidence for a four-factor structure within a new Quality of Children's Palliative Care Instrument (QCPCI) with demonstrated reliability when used with mothers and fathers of children with cancer. Ongoing assessment of the psychometric properties is needed, including testing in additional populations. However, our initial findings suggest that the QCPCI may be a helpful tool for assessing the quality of palliative care for pediatric patients anywhere along the disease trajectory from the perspective of parents.

Indexed as

AdultChildChild, PreschoolChildren with DisabilitiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPalliative CareParentsPatient SatisfactionPediatricsPsychometricsQuality of Health CareReproducibility of ResultsInstrument developmentPalliative carePediatricsQuality care

Identifiers

PMID30823877
PMCPMC6397460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.