Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30822774›Full record

Trial reportNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2019

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of F17464, a preferential D

Istvan Bitter, Jeffrey A Lieberman, Florence Gaudoux, Pierre Sokoloff, Mélanie Groc, Rajeev Chavda, Cécile Delsol, Laurence Barthe, Valérie Brunner, Carine Fabre and 3 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Istvan BitterDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Balassa u.6, Budapest, 1083, Hungary.
Jeffrey A LiebermanNew York Presbyterian Hospital - Columbia University Medical Center, 1051 Riverside Drive, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Florence GaudouxInstitut de Recherche Pierre Fabre, 3 avenue Hubert Curien, Toulouse, 31000, France.
Pierre SokoloffPSAdvice, Impasse Larosa, Ile-aux-Moines, 56780, France.
Mélanie GrocInstitut de Recherche Pierre Fabre, 3 avenue Hubert Curien, Toulouse, 31000, France.
Rajeev ChavdaGalderma, Rue D'Entre-deux-Villes 10, La Tour de Peilz, 1814, Switzerland.
Cécile DelsolInstitut de Recherche Pierre Fabre, 3 avenue Hubert Curien, Toulouse, 31000, France.
Laurence BartheInstitut de Recherche Pierre Fabre, 3 avenue Hubert Curien, Toulouse, 31000, France.
Valérie BrunnerIRIS Servier, 50 rue Carot, Suresnes Cedex, 92284, France.
Carine FabreInstitut de Recherche Pierre Fabre, 3 avenue Hubert Curien, Toulouse, 31000, France.
Marine FagardInstitut de Recherche Pierre Fabre, 3 avenue Hubert Curien, Toulouse, 31000, France.
Agnès MontagneInstitut de Recherche Pierre Fabre, 3 avenue Hubert Curien, Toulouse, 31000, France.
Françoise TonnerInstitut de Recherche Pierre Fabre, 3 avenue Hubert Curien, Toulouse, 31000, France. francoise.tonner@pierre-fabre.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0327-2170

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

F17464, a highly potent preferential D3 antagonist, is a novel compound in development for schizophrenia treatment. This phase II, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study in five European countries evaluated the efficacy and safety of F17464, 20 mg twice daily, versus placebo over 6 weeks in patients with acute exacerbation of schizophrenia. Change from baseline to Day 43 of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score was the primary outcome. The data from 134 randomized patients (67 per group) were analyzed (efficacy/safety). Using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) after last observation carried forward (LOCF) imputation (primary analysis), the PANSS total score reduction was statistically significantly greater for F17464 than placebo treated subjects at endpoint (p = 0.014); using ANCOVA with Multiple Imputation (MI) method, the between-group difference was in favor of F17464 but did not reach statistical significance. Differences in PANSS positive and general psychopathology subscale score, Marder positive factor score, PANSS response, and PANSS resolution criteria were also statistically significant in favor of F17464 (p values < 0.05) using the LOCF method, with similar results as for the primary analysis using the MI method. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were reported in 49.3% and 46.3% of patients on F17464 and placebo, respectively. The most common AEs in F17464 group: insomnia, agitation, and increased triglycerides; worsening of schizophrenia/drug ineffective was less frequent in F17464. Interestingly, no weight gain, no extrapyramidal disorder except rare akathisia were observed under F17464. This 6-week trial demonstrated therapeutic efficacy of 40 mg/day F17464 in improving symptoms of acute exacerbation of schizophrenia with a favorable safety profile.

Indexed as

AdultAkathisia, Drug-InducedAntipsychotic AgentsDopamine AntagonistsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReceptors, Dopamine D3SchizophreniaSleep Initiation and Maintenance DisordersTreatment OutcomeAntipsychotic AgentsDopamine AntagonistsReceptors, Dopamine D3

Identifiers

PMID30822774
PMCPMC6785149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.