Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30822699›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in biotechnology2019

Selecting and engineering monoclonal antibodies with drug-like specificity.

Charles G Starr, Peter M Tessier

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in biotechnology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Antibody-Nanoparticle Conjugates in Therapy: Combining the Best of Two Worlds.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Nonspecificity fingerprints for clinical-stage antibodies in solution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Surface patches induce nonspecific binding and phase separation of antibodies.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. How can we discover developable antibody-based biotherapeutics?Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Charles G StarrDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; Biointerfaces Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Peter M TessierDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; Biointerfaces Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. Electronic address: ptessier@umich.edu.

Funding

Mechanisms transducing insulin and insulin resistance in the hippocampusR01AG050598 · NIA · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT ALBANY · PI MCNAY, EWAN C · 2016 to 2020
$1.9M
Design of Antibody Fragments Specific For Amyloidogenic AggregatesR01GM104130 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI TESSIER, PETER M · 2014 to 2018
$1.3M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG050598NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM104130
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the recent explosion in the use of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) as drugs, it remains a significant challenge to generate antibodies with a combination of physicochemical properties that are optimal for therapeutic applications. We argue that one of the most important and underappreciated drug-like antibody properties is high specificity - defined here as low levels of antibody non-specific and self-interactions - which is linked to low off-target binding and slow antibody clearance in vivo and high solubility and low viscosity in vitro. Here, we review the latest advances in characterizing antibody specificity and elucidating its molecular determinants as well as using these findings to improve the selection and engineering of antibodies with extremely high, drug-like specificity.

Indexed as

Antibody SpecificityAntibodies, MonoclonalSolubilityViscosityAntibodies, Monoclonal

Identifiers

PMID30822699
PMCPMC6829062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.