Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30822313›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2019

Poison severity score and sequential organ failure assessment score: Carbon monoxide poisoning prognosis.

Il Jae Wang, Seok-Ran Yeom, Sung-Wook Park, Sung-Hwa Lee, Sang-Kyoon Han, Soon-Chang Park, Ji-Ho Ryu, Seong-Youn Hwang

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Il Jae WangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-2479-2359
Seok-Ran YeomDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-1000-9637
Sung-Wook ParkDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6699-8553
Sung-Hwa LeeDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, South Korea.
Sang-Kyoon HanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, South Korea.
Soon-Chang ParkDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, South Korea.
Ji-Ho RyuDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Gyeongsangnam-do, Yangsan, South Korea.
Seong-Youn HwangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Gyeongsangnam-do, Changwon, South Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe aimed to examine the utility of the Poison Severity Score (PSS) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score as early prognostic predictors of short-term outcomes in patients with carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning. We hypothesized that both the PSS and the SOFA score would be useful prognostic tools.

methodsThis was retrospective observational study of patients with CO poisoning who presented to the emergency department and were admitted for more than 24 hours. We calculated PSS, the initial SOFA score, a second (2nd) SOFA score, and a 24-hour delta SOFA score. The primary outcome was reported as the cerebral performance category (CPC) scale score at discharge. We classified those with CPC 1-2 as the good outcome group and those with CPC 3-5 as the poor outcome group.

resultsThis study included 192 patients: 174 (90.6%) belonged to the good outcome group, whereas 18 (9.4%) belonged to the poor outcome group. The PSS (1.00 [0.00, 1.00] vs 3.00 [3.00, 3.00], p < 0.001), initial SOFA (1.00 [0.00, 2.00] vs 4.00 [3.25, 6.00], p < 0.001), 2nd SOFA score (0.00 [0.00, 1.00] vs 4.00 [3.00, 7.00], p < 0.001), and 24-hour delta SOFA score (-1.00 [-1.00, 0.00] vs 0.00 [-1.00, 1.00], p = 0.047) of the good outcome group were significantly higher than those of the poor outcome group. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for PSS and the initial SOFA and 2nd SOFA scores were 0.977 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.944-0.993), 0.945 (95% CI 0.903-0.973), and 0.978 (95% CI 0.947-0.994), respectively.

conclusionThe PSS, initial SOFA score, and 2nd SOFA score predict acute poor outcome accurately in patients with CO poisoning.

Indexed as

Organ Dysfunction ScoresAdultAPACHEArea Under CurveCarbon MonoxideCarbon Monoxide PoisoningEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedMultiple Organ FailurePrognosisRetrospective StudiesROC CurveCarbon Monoxide

Identifiers

PMID30822313
PMCPMC6396897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.