ArticleEndocrine connections2019
AIP and MEN1 mutations and AIP immunohistochemistry in pituitary adenomas in a tertiary referral center.
Article in Endocrine connections, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Relevance of Genetic Analysis in Patients With Pituitary Adenomas: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2019Pooled it
- Higher ARNT expression is associated with the sparsely granulated phenotype in somatotroph pituitary adenomas: An immunohistochemical study.Pituitary · 2026Article
- Genetic testing in pituitary adenomas: a Pituitary Society International Consensus Statement.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2026Review
- Can acromegaly be controlled in all cases?Journal of neuroendocrinology · 2026Review
- A Case of Cushing's Disease and a RET Pathogenic Variant: Exploring Possible Rare Associations.Cureus · 2024Article
- The Spectrum of Familial Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors.Endocrine pathology · 2023Review
- The clinical and therapeutic profiles of prolactinomas associated with germline pathogenic variants in theFrontiers in endocrinology · 2023Article
- Real-world experience with pasireotide-LAR in resistant acromegaly: a single center 1-year observation.Pituitary · 2022Article
- Aggressive prolactinoma (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2022Review
- Molecular targets in acromegaly.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Review
- Predictive and prognostic significance of tumour subtype, SSTR1-5 and e-cadherin expression in a well-defined cohort of patients with acromegaly.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2021Article
- The Genetics of Pituitary Adenomas.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Review
- Genetics of Growth Disorders-Which Patients Require Genetic Testing?Frontiers in endocrinology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPituitary adenomas have a high disease burden due to tumor growth/invasion and disordered hormonal secretion. Germline mutations in genes such as MEN1 and AIP are associated with early onset of aggressive pituitary adenomas that can be resistant to medical therapy.
aimsWe performed a retrospective screening study using published risk criteria to assess the frequency of AIP and MEN1 mutations in pituitary adenoma patients in a tertiary referral center.
methodsPituitary adenoma patients with pediatric/adolescent onset, macroadenomas occurring ≤30 years of age, familial isolated pituitary adenoma (FIPA) kindreds and acromegaly or prolactinoma cases that were uncontrolled by medical therapy were studied genetically. We also assessed whether immunohistochemical staining for AIP (AIP-IHC) in somatotropinomas was associated with somatostatin analogs (SSA) response.
resultsFifty-five patients met the study criteria and underwent genetic screening for AIP/MEN1 mutations. No mutations were identified and large deletions/duplications were ruled out using MLPA. In a cohort of sporadic somatotropinomas, low AIP-IHC tumors were significantly larger (P = 0.002) and were more frequently sparsely granulated (P = 0.046) than high AIP-IHC tumors. No significant relationship between AIP-IHC and SSA responses was seen.
conclusionsGermline mutations in AIP/MEN1 in pituitary adenoma patients are rare and the use of general risk criteria did not identify cases in a large tertiary-referral setting. In acromegaly, low AIP-IHC was related to larger tumor size and more frequent sparsely granulated subtype but no relationship with SSA responsiveness was seen. The genetics of pituitary adenomas remains largely unexplained and AIP screening criteria could be significantly refined to focus on large, aggressive tumors in young patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.