Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30822169›Full record

ReviewInternational review of psychiatry (Abingdon, England)2018

Physical health outcomes and implementation of behavioural health homes: a comprehensive review.

Karly A Murphy, Gail L Daumit, Elizabeth Stone, Emma E McGinty

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International review of psychiatry (Abingdon, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Karly A Murphya Division of General Internal Medicine , Johns Hopkins School of Medicine , Baltimore , MD , USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5576-8859
Gail L Daumita Division of General Internal Medicine , Johns Hopkins School of Medicine , Baltimore , MD , USA.
Elizabeth Stonea Division of General Internal Medicine , Johns Hopkins School of Medicine , Baltimore , MD , USA.
Emma E McGintyb Department of Health Policy and Management , Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health , Baltimore , MD , USA.
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Using an innovative quality improvement process to increase delivery of evidenced-based CVD risk factor care in community mental health organizationsP50MH115842 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Elizabeth A. Stuart · 2018 to 2026
$16.2M
BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH IN HEART &VASCULAR DISEASET32HL007180 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MARUTHUR, NISA M · 1985 to 2020
$11.4M
Comprehensive CVD Risk Reduction Trial in Persons with Serious Mental IllnessR01HL112299 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DAUMIT, GAIL L. · 2012 to 2017
$5.5M
Improving Evidence-based Behavioral, Somatic and Social Service Delivery for SMIK01MH106631 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MCGINTY, EMMA ELIZABETH · 2015 to 2018
$711k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL112299NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007180NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH106631NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH115842
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People with serious mental illness (SMI) have mortality rates 2-3-times higher than the general population, mostly driven by physical health conditions. Behavioural health homes (BHHs) integrate primary care into specialty mental healthcare settings with the goal of improving management of physical health conditions among people with SMI. Implementation and evaluation of BHH models is increasing in the US. This comprehensive review summarized the available evidence on the effects of BHHs on physical healthcare delivery and outcomes and identified perceived barriers and facilitators that have arisen during implementation to-date. This review found 11 studies reporting outcomes data on utilization, screening/monitoring, health promotion, patient-reported outcomes, physical health and/or costs of BHHs. The results of the review suggest that BHHs have resulted in improved primary care access and screening and monitoring for cardiovascular-related conditions among consumers with SMI. No significant effect of BHHs was reported for outcomes on diabetes control, weight management, or smoking cessation. Overall, the physical health outcomes data is limited and mixed, and implementation of BHHs is variable.

Indexed as

Outcome Assessment, Health CareCardiovascular DiseasesHealth PromotionHumansMass ScreeningPrimary Health CarePsychiatrybehavioural health homeimplementationoutcomesphysical healthSerious mental illness

Identifiers

PMID30822169
PMCPMC6499693
OpenAlexW2920279812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.