Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30821881›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2019

Geometric and dosimetric impact of anatomical changes for MR-only radiation therapy for the prostate.

Siamak P Nejad-Davarani, Parag Sevak, Michael Moncion, Kimberly Garbarino, Steffen Weiss, Joshua Kim, Lonni Schultz, Mohamed A Elshaikh, Steffen Renisch, Carri Glide-Hurst

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Dosimetric evaluation of ultrafractionated dose escalation with simultaneous integrated boost to intraprostatic lesion using 1.5-Tesla MR-Linac in localized prostate cancer.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Assessment of intrafractional prostate motion and its dosimetric impact in MRI-guided online adaptive radiotherapy with gating.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Automatic localization of the prostatic urethra for image guided radiation therapy.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2021
    Article
  15. Maintaining consistent bladder filling during external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Siamak P Nejad-DavaraniDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, USA.
Parag SevakThe Cancer Center, Columbus Regional Health, Columbus, IN, USA.
Michael MoncionRadiation Oncology Department, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
Kimberly GarbarinoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, USA.
Steffen WeissDepartment of Digital Imaging, Philips Research Laboratories, Hamburg, Germany.
Joshua KimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, USA.
Lonni SchultzDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA.
Mohamed A ElshaikhDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, USA.
Steffen RenischDepartment of Digital Imaging, Philips Research Laboratories, Hamburg, Germany.
Carri Glide-HurstDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, USA.

Funding

Development of Anatomical Patient Models to Facilitate MR-only Treatment PlanningR01CA204189 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI GLIDE-HURST, CARRI KAYE · 2016 to 2020
$1.5M
National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health R01CA204189NCI NIH HHS R01 CA204189
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWith the move towards magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a primary treatment planning modality option for men with prostate cancer, it becomes critical to quantify the potential uncertainties introduced for MR-only planning. This work characterized geometric and dosimetric intra-fractional changes between the prostate, seminal vesicles (SVs), and organs at risk (OARs) in response to bladder filling conditions. MATERIALS AND

methodsT2-weighted and mDixon sequences (3-4 time points/subject, at 1, 1.5 and 3.0 T with totally 34 evaluable time points) were acquired in nine subjects using a fixed bladder filling protocol (bladder void, 20 oz water consumed pre-imaging, 10 oz mid-session). Using mDixon images, Magnetic Resonance for Calculating Attenuation (MR-CAT) synthetic computed tomography (CT) images were generated by classifying voxels as muscle, adipose, spongy, and compact bone and by assignment of bulk Hounsfield Unit values. Organs including the prostate, SVs, bladder, and rectum were delineated on the T2 images at each time point by one physician. The displacement of the prostate and SVs was assessed based on the shift of the center of mass of the delineated organs from the reference state (fullest bladder). Changes in dose plans at different bladder states were assessed based on volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) plans generated for the reference state.

resultsBladder volume reduction of 70 ± 14% from the final to initial time point (relative to the final volume) was observed in the subject population. In the empty bladder condition, the dose delivered to 95% of the planning target volume (PTV) (D95%) reduced significantly for all cases (11.53 ± 6.00%) likely due to anterior shifts of prostate/SVs relative to full bladder conditions. D15% to the bladder increased consistently in all subjects (42.27 ± 40.52%). Changes in D15% to the rectum were patient-specific, ranging from -23.93% to 22.28% (-0.76 ± 15.30%).

conclusionsVariations in the bladder and rectal volume can significantly dislocate the prostate and OARs, which can negatively impact the dose delivered to these organs. This warrants proper preparation of patients during treatment and imaging sessions, especially when imaging required longer scan times such as MR protocols.

Indexed as

AdultHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedOrgans at RiskPrognosisProstateProstatic NeoplasmsRadiometryRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assistedbladder fillingdose calculationsynthetic CTtransient anatomies

Identifiers

PMID30821881
PMCPMC6448347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.