Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30821875›Full record

ArticleHealth & social care in the community2019

Working conditions, mental health and coping of staff in social work with refugees and homeless individuals: A scoping review.

Tanja Wirth, Janika Mette, Jerrit Prill, Volker Harth, Albert Nienhaus

Open access · hybridAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Health & social care in the community, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
15.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Burnout Syndrome and Related Factors in Mexican Police Workforces.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tanja WirthCompetence Centre for Epidemiology and Health Services Research for Healthcare Professionals (CVcare), University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6762-4430
Janika MetteInstitute for Occupational and Maritime Medicine, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany.
Jerrit PrillInstitute for Occupational and Maritime Medicine, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany.
Volker HarthInstitute for Occupational and Maritime Medicine, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany.
Albert NienhausCompetence Centre for Epidemiology and Health Services Research for Healthcare Professionals (CVcare), University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany.
Universität Hamburg · DE

Funding

Institution for Statutory Accident Insurance and Prevention in the Health and Welfare Services (BGW)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The refugee and homeless population has been increasing worldwide in recent years. Staff in social work provide practical help to these populations, but often struggle with high job demands. This scoping review aims to systematically map the job demands, resources, mental health problems, coping strategies and needs of staff in social work with refugees and homeless individuals. Relevant studies were identified by searching seven electronic databases from their inception until the end of May 2018, as well as Google Scholar and reference lists of included articles. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. A thematic analysis was conducted. Twenty-five studies were included in the review. Fourteen studies followed a quantitative approach, six a qualitative approach and five a mixed-method approach. Most studies were conducted in the homeless sector (56%), in North America (52%) and published after the year 2009 (68%). Common job demands included the bureaucratic system, high caseloads, clients' suffering and little experience of success. Maintaining professional boundaries counted both as a job demand and a coping strategy. Deriving meaning from work and support from the team were identified as important job resources. The prevalence of mental health problems among staff was high, but difficult to compare due to the use of different instruments in studies. Staff expressed a need for ongoing training, external counselling and supervision. Further studies should examine the effectiveness of workplace health interventions.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalMental HealthHumansIll-Housed PersonsInterpersonal RelationsLongitudinal StudiesRefugeesSocial SupportSocial WorkersWorkloadWorkplacehomelessnessjob demands and resourcesmental healthrefugeesscoping reviewsocial work

Identifiers

PMID30821875
PMCPMC6850100
OpenAlexW2919969234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.