Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30821824›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2019

Factors Associated With Acute Pain Estimation, Postoperative Pain Resolution, Opioid Cessation, and Recovery: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Jennifer M Hah, Eric Cramer, Heather Hilmoe, Peter Schmidt, Rebecca McCue, Jodie Trafton, Debra Clay, Yasamin Sharifzadeh, Gabriela Ruchelli, Stuart Goodman and 8 more

Erratum issued 4 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 60 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01067144 phase3terminatednot on this map

Stanford Accelerated Recovery Trial (START)

TypeinterventionalSponsorStanford UniversityRan2010 to 2016Enrolled422ConditionsPain, Breast Cancer, Lung CancerArmsGabapentin, Lorazepam (active control), Placebo (inactive)
NCT07523321 phase4not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Perioperative Use of Dexmedetomidine-esketamine Combination on Incidence of Moderate-to-severe Pain After Spinal Surgery: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorPeking University First HospitalRan2026 to 2027Enrolled274ConditionsSpinal Surgery, Pain Intensity, Dexmedetomidine, EsketamineArmsCombined dexmedetomidine-esketamine administration, Placebo administration
NCT07525999 phase4not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Perioperative Use of Dexmedetomidine-esketamine Combination on Incidence of Chronic Postsurgical Pain After Spinal Surgery: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorPeking University First HospitalRan2026 to 2027Enrolled274ConditionsSpinal Surgery, Pain Intensity, Dexmedetomidine, EsketamineArmsCombined dexmedetomidine-esketamine administration, Placebo administration
NCT07689162 phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Liposomal Bupivacaine vs Standard Bupivacaine for Post-Rhinoplasty Analgesia: A Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorWashington University School of MedicineRan2026 to 2027Enrolled45ConditionsPain, PostoperativeArmsStandard Bupivacaine, Liposomal Bupivacaine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Moving towards the use of artificial intelligence in pain management.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Predicting Extent of Opioid Use Following Cardiac Surgery: A Pilot Study.Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia · 2025
    Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Jennifer M HahDivision of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
Eric CramerStanford Systems Neuroscience and Pain Lab, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
Heather HilmoeStanford Systems Neuroscience and Pain Lab, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
Peter SchmidtStanford Systems Neuroscience and Pain Lab, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
Rebecca McCueStanford Systems Neuroscience and Pain Lab, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
Jodie TraftonPsychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
Debra ClayStanford Systems Neuroscience and Pain Lab, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
Yasamin SharifzadehStanford Systems Neuroscience and Pain Lab, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
Gabriela RuchelliStanford Systems Neuroscience and Pain Lab, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
Stuart GoodmanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Redwood City, California.
James HuddlestonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
William J MaloneyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
Frederick M DirbasDepartment of General Surgery, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
Joseph ShragerCardiothoracic Surgery, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
John G CostourosDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
Catherine CurtinDivision of Hand and Plastic Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
Sean C MackeyDivision of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
Ian CarrollDivision of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.

Funding

Psychological Risk Factors for Persistent Opioid Use and Prevention of Chronic Opioid Use and Misuse After Surgery: Postoperative Motivational Interviewing and Guided Opioid WeaningR01DA045027 · NIDA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HAH, JENNIFER · 2018 to 2022
$2.6M
Psychological Factors Contributing to Persistent Opioid Use After SurgeryK23DA035302 · NIDA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HAH, JENNIFER · 2013 to 2017
$903k
NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA035302NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA045027
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Acute postoperative pain is associated with the development of persistent postsurgical pain, but it is unclear which aspect is most estimable. Objective: To identify patient clusters based on acute pain trajectories, preoperative psychosocial characteristics associated with the high-risk cluster, and the best acute pain predictor of remote outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: A secondary analysis of the Stanford Accelerated Recovery Trial randomized, double-blind clinical trial was conducted at a single-center, tertiary, referral teaching hospital. A total of 422 participants scheduled for thoracotomy, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, total hip replacement, total knee replacement, mastectomy, breast lumpectomy, hand surgery, carpal tunnel surgery, knee arthroscopy, shoulder arthroplasty, or shoulder arthroscopy were enrolled between May 25, 2010, and July 25, 2014. Data analysis was performed from January 1 to August 1, 2018. Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive gabapentin (1200 mg, preoperatively, and 600 mg, 3 times a day postoperatively) or active placebo (lorazepam, 0.5 mg preoperatively, inactive placebo postoperatively) for 72 hours. Main Outcomes and Measures: A modified Brief Pain Inventory prospectively captured 3 surgical site pain outcomes: average pain and worst pain intensity over the past 24 hours, and current pain intensity. Within each category, acute pain trajectories (first 10 postoperative pain scores) were compared using a k-means clustering algorithm. Fifteen descriptors of acute pain were compared as predictors of remote postoperative pain resolution, opioid cessation, and full recovery. Results: Of the 422 patients enrolled, 371 patients (≤10% missing pain scores) were included in the analysis. Of these, 146 (39.4%) were men; mean (SD) age was 56.67 (11.70) years. Two clusters were identified within each trajectory category. The high pain cluster of the average pain trajectory significantly predicted prolonged pain (hazard ratio [HR], 0.63; 95% CI, 0.50-0.80; P < .001) and delayed opioid cessation (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.41-0.67; P < .001) but was not a predictor of time to recovery in Cox proportional hazards regression (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.69-1.14; P = .89). Preoperative risk factors for categorization to the high average pain cluster included female sex (adjusted relative risk [ARR], 1.36; 95% CI, 1.08-1.70; P = .008), elevated preoperative pain (ARR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.07-1.15; P < .001), a history of alcohol or drug abuse treatment (ARR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.42-2.53; P < .001), and receiving active placebo (ARR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.03-1.56; P = .03). Worst pain reported on postoperative day 10 was the best predictor of time to pain resolution (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.78-0.87; P < .001), opioid cessation (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.80-0.89; P < .001), and complete surgical recovery (HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.86-0.96; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: This study has shown a possible uniform predictor of remote postoperative pain, opioid use, and recovery that can be easily assessed. Future work is needed to replicate these findings. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01067144.

Indexed as

Acute PainPostoperative PainAgedAnalgesicsAnalgesics, OpioidDouble-Blind MethodFemaleGabapentinHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPreoperative CarePrognosisPsychologyRisk AssessmentAnalgesicsAnalgesics, OpioidGabapentin

Identifiers

PMID30821824
PMCPMC6484627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.