Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30821709›Full record

ReviewActa crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology2019

Radiation damage in protein crystallography at X-ray free-electron lasers.

Karol Nass

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Radiation damage in serial femtosecond crystallography studied in hemoglobin.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. A snapshot love story: what serial crystallography has done and will do for us.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Beam Effects in Synchrotron RadiationChemistry of materials : a publication of the American Chemical Society · 2024
    Article
  14. SARS-CoV-2 MNature communications · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. The time revolution in macromolecular crystallography.Structural dynamics (Melville, N.Y.) · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Karol NassSwiss Light Source, Paul Scherrer Institut, Forschungsstrasse 111, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8843-1566

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiation damage is still the most limiting factor in obtaining high-resolution structures of macromolecules in crystallographic experiments at synchrotrons. With the advent of X-ray free-electron lasers (XFELs) that produce ultrashort and highly intense X-ray pulses, it became possible to outrun most of the radiation-damage processes occurring in the sample during exposure to XFEL radiation. Although this is generally the case, several experimental and theoretical studies have indicated that structures from XFELs may not always be radiation-damage free. This is especially true when higher intensity pulses are used and protein molecules that contain heavy elements in their structures are studied. Here, the radiation-damage mechanisms that occur in samples exposed to XFEL pulses are summarized, results that show indications of radiation damage are reviewed and methods that can partially overcome it are discussed.

Indexed as

ElectronsLasersAnimalsCrystallography, X-RayHumansModels, MolecularProtein ConformationProteinsX-RaysProteinsradiation damageserial femtosecond crystallographyX-ray free-electron lasers

Identifiers

PMID30821709
PMCPMC6400258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.