ArticleACS sensors2019
Rapid and Accurate Determination of Nanopore Ionic Current Using a Steric Exclusion Model.
Article in ACS sensors, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.
- Solid-state nanopore sensing: the next workhorse of biophysical characterization.Nature methods · 2026Review
- Single-Molecule Fingerprinting of Unlabeled Full-Length Proteins Using an Aerolysin Nanopore.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026Article
- Engineering a Biological Nanopore for Monitoring Protein Dynamics and Conformational Changes at the Single-Molecule Level.ACS nano · 2026Article
- Optimization of the Quantum-Si Platinum Single-Molecule Protein Sequencing Platform Toward Improved Complex-Matrix Protein Identification.ACS omega · 2026Article
- High-Rate Fingerprinting of Protein Isoforms by Quasi-regulated Enzyme-free Transport Through CytK Nanopores.Research square · 2026Article
- Improving All-Atom Molecular Dynamics Models for Quantitative Prediction of Nanopore Blockade Current.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Barrel expansion of outer membrane protein G nanopore through β-hairpin duplication.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025Article
- Insights on using plastic-based dual in-plane nanopore sensors for differentiation and shape determinations of single protein molecules.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Tracking flaviviral protease conformational dynamics by tuning single-molecule nanopore tweezers.Biophysical journal · 2025Article
- Single-molecule profiling of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances by cyclodextrin mediated host-guest interactions within a biological nanopore.Science advances · 2024Article
- A lumen-tunable triangular DNA nanopore for molecular sensing and cross-membrane transport.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Nanopore Translocation Reveals Electrophoretic Force on Noncanonical RNA:DNA Double Helix.ACS nano · 2024Article
- Single molecule delivery into living cells.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Molecular Determinants of Current Blockade Produced by Peptide Transport Through a Nanopore.ACS nanoscience Au · 2024Review
- Peptide sequencing based on host-guest interaction-assisted nanopore sensing.Nature methods · 2024Article
- Recent Advances in Modeling Membrane β-Barrel Proteins Using Molecular Dynamics Simulations: From Their Lipid Environments to Their Assemblies.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Review
- DNA Volume, Topology, and Flexibility Dictate Nanopore Current Signals.Nano letters · 2023Article
- β-Barrel Nanopores with an Acidic-Aromatic Sensing Region Identify Proteinogenic Peptides at Low pH.ACS nano · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Nanopore sensing has emerged as a versatile approach to detection and identification of biomolecules. Presently, researchers rely on experience and intuition for choosing or modifying the nanopores to detect a target analyte. The field would greatly benefit from a computational method that could relate the atomic-scale geometry of the nanopores and analytes to the blockade nanopore currents they produce. Existing computational methods are either computationally too expensive to be used routinely in experimental laboratories or not sensitive enough to account for the atomic structure of the pore and the analytes. Here, we demonstrate a robust and inexpensive computational approach-the steric exclusion model (SEM) of nanopore conductance-that is orders of magnitude more efficient than all-atom MD and yet is sensitive enough to account for the atomic structure of the nanopore and the analyte. The method combines the computational efficiency of a finite element solver with the atomic precision of a nanopore conductance map to yield unprecedented speed and accuracy of ionic current prediction. We validate our SEM approach through comparison with the current blockades computed using the all-atom molecular dynamics method for a range of proteins confined to a solid-state nanopore, biological channels embedded in a lipid bilayer membranes, and blockade currents produced by DNA homopolymers in MspA. We illustrate potential applications of SEM by computing blockade currents produced by nucleosome proteins in a solid-state nanopore, individual amino acids in MspA, and by testing the effect of point mutations on amino acid distinguishability. We expect our SEM approach to become an integral part of future development of the nanopore sensing field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.