Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30821441›Full record

ArticleACS sensors2019

Rapid and Accurate Determination of Nanopore Ionic Current Using a Steric Exclusion Model.

James Wilson, Kumar Sarthak, Wei Si, Luyu Gao, Aleksei Aksimentiev

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS sensors, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Barrel expansion of outer membrane protein G nanopore through β-hairpin duplication.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Single molecule delivery into living cells.Nature communications · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

James Wilson
Kumar Sarthak
Wei SiJiangsu Key Laboratory for Design and Manufacture of Micro-Nano Biomedical Instruments and School of Mechanical Engineering , Southeast University , Nanjing , 210096 , China.ORCID 0000-0001-7285-058X
Luyu Gao
Aleksei AksimentievORCID 0000-0002-6042-8442
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USSoutheast University · CN

Funding

WHOLE CELL SIMULATIONP41GM104601 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI TAJKHORSHID, EMAD · 2012 to 2021
$19.0M
Plasmonic nanopores for trapping, controlled motion and sequencing of DNAR01HG007406 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI AKSIMENTIEV, ALEKSEI · 2013 to 2016
$2.4M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG007406NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM104601
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanopore sensing has emerged as a versatile approach to detection and identification of biomolecules. Presently, researchers rely on experience and intuition for choosing or modifying the nanopores to detect a target analyte. The field would greatly benefit from a computational method that could relate the atomic-scale geometry of the nanopores and analytes to the blockade nanopore currents they produce. Existing computational methods are either computationally too expensive to be used routinely in experimental laboratories or not sensitive enough to account for the atomic structure of the pore and the analytes. Here, we demonstrate a robust and inexpensive computational approach-the steric exclusion model (SEM) of nanopore conductance-that is orders of magnitude more efficient than all-atom MD and yet is sensitive enough to account for the atomic structure of the nanopore and the analyte. The method combines the computational efficiency of a finite element solver with the atomic precision of a nanopore conductance map to yield unprecedented speed and accuracy of ionic current prediction. We validate our SEM approach through comparison with the current blockades computed using the all-atom molecular dynamics method for a range of proteins confined to a solid-state nanopore, biological channels embedded in a lipid bilayer membranes, and blockade currents produced by DNA homopolymers in MspA. We illustrate potential applications of SEM by computing blockade currents produced by nucleosome proteins in a solid-state nanopore, individual amino acids in MspA, and by testing the effect of point mutations on amino acid distinguishability. We expect our SEM approach to become an integral part of future development of the nanopore sensing field.

Indexed as

Molecular Dynamics SimulationNanoporesDNAElectric ConductivityIon TransportNucleosomesPoint MutationPorinsTime FactorsDNAmspA protein, Mycobacterium smegmatisNucleosomesPorinsionic currentmolecular dynamicsnanoporeprotein sequencingstochastic sensing

Identifiers

PMID30821441
PMCPMC6489136
OpenAlexW2918416305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.