Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30821428›Full record

ArticleJournal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing2019

Identification of Binge Eating Disorder Criteria: Results of a National Survey of Healthcare Providers.

Ariana M Chao, Adithi V Rajagopalan, Jena Shaw Tronieri, Olivia Walsh, Thomas A Wadden

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Loss of control as a transdiagnostic feature in obesity-related eating behaviours: A systematic review.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Binge Eating Disorder in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Diagnostic and Management Challenges.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ariana M ChaoUniversity of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Department of Biobehavioral Health Sciences, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5633-8973
Adithi V RajagopalanUniversity of Pennsylvania Graduate School of Education, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Jena Shaw TronieriPerelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Department of Psychiatry, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Olivia WalshPerelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Department of Psychiatry, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Thomas A WaddenPerelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Department of Psychiatry, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
University of Pennsylvania · USNeurobehavioral Systems · US

Funding

RESEARCH ON VULNERABLE WOMEN CHILDREN AND FAMILIEST32NR007100 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MEDOFF-COOPER, BARBARA S · 1998 to 2018
$7.2M
Improving Weight Loss in Early Non-responders to Behavioral TreatmentK23DK116935 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI TRONIERI, JENNIFER SHAW · 2019 to 2023
$938k
Neural response to food stimuli: fMRI changes following cognitive behavioral therapy for binge eating disorderK23NR017209 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CHAO, ARIANA MARIE · 2018 to 2020
$520k
NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK116935NINR NIH HHS K23 NR017209NINR NIH HHS T32 NR007100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine whether general healthcare providers and adult psychiatrists recognized binge eating disorder (BED) symptoms and features. The aims were to examine how they delineated the core criteria of BED-eating a large amount of food and sense of loss of control over eating-and how their evaluations compared to ratings by BED experts.

designThis is a cross-sectional study of a nationwide U.S. sample of healthcare providers and a convenience sample of BED experts.

methodsProviders were mailed surveys that asked respondents about their perceptions of a large amount of food and whether they thought case vignettes met thresholds for loss of control. Participants were also asked to select BED diagnostic criteria from a symptom list. Results were analyzed using one-way analyses of variance with post-hoc comparisons and chi-squared tests.

findingsThe survey was completed by 405 healthcare providers (response rate of 28.4%). Ratings of a large amount of food did not differ between BED experts and general healthcare providers (p = .10) or psychiatrists (p = .90). Provider groups did not differ significantly on whether five of the six vignettes met thresholds for loss of control (p > .05). Of the respondents, 93.0% of general healthcare providers and 88.6% of psychiatrists could not correctly identify the diagnostic criteria for BED.

conclusionsAcross provider groups, demarcation of a large amount of food and loss of control over eating were relatively consistent. However, general healthcare providers and psychiatrists were not able to correctly identify BED symptoms. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Training and education are greatly needed to improve knowledge of the diagnostic criteria for BED.

Indexed as

AdultAnalysis of VarianceBinge-Eating DisorderCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesMental disordersmental health/psychiatricnutritionprimary health care survey methodology/data collection

Identifiers

PMID30821428
PMCPMC6610653
OpenAlexW2918425638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.