ArticleInternational wound journal2019
Potential prognostic factors for delayed healing of common, non-traumatic skin ulcers: A scoping review.
Article in International wound journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Independent Prognostic Factors for Predicting Wound Healing in People With Venous Leg Ulcers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair SocietyPooled it
- Use of Continuous Topical Oxygen Therapy to Treat Lower-Extremity Surgical Wound Dehiscence: A Retrospective Review.Eplasty · 2025Article
- Characteristics of chronic ulcer patients by gender and ulcer aetiology from a multidisciplinary wound centre.International wound journal · 2024Article
- Article
- The role of split-thickness skin grafting in the treatment of vasculitic and pyoderma gangrenosum ulcers in a multidisciplinary wound centre.International wound journal · 2024Article
- Wound management, healing, and early prosthetic rehabilitation: Part 1 - A scoping review of healing and non-healing definitions.Canadian prosthetics & orthotics journal · 2024Review
- Wound management, healing, and early prosthetic rehabilitation: Part 2 - A scoping review of physical biomarkers.Canadian prosthetics & orthotics journal · 2024Review
- Prognostic factors for delayed healing of complex wounds in adults: A scoping review.International wound journal · 2023Article
- [Influence factors of poor efficacy after flap repair operation in patients with pressure ulcers].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2022Article
- Prognostic Factors for Delayed Healing of Complex Wounds in Adults: A Scoping Review Protocol.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2022Article
- Prognostic value of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in adults with non-small cell Lung Cancer: a scoping review.BMC cancer · 2022Article
- [Prevalence and risk factors of deep venous thrombosis of lower extremity in patients with stageZhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2022Article
- Development and use of the PodEssential and Paeds-PodEssential triage tools to define "essential" podiatry services. A Delphi survey, scoping review, and face validity testing study.Journal of foot and ankle research · 2022Article
- Development of a model to predict closure of chronic wounds in Germany: Claims data analysis.International wound journal · 2022Article
- Prevalence of acute and chronic wounds - with emphasis on pressure ulcers - in integrated continuing care units in Alentejo, Portugal.International wound journal · 2020Article
- Potential prognostic factors for delayed healing of common, non-traumatic skin ulcers: A scoping review.International wound journal · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Healing of non-traumatic skin ulcers is often suboptimal. Prognostic tools that identify people at high risk of delayed healing within the context of routine ulcer assessments may improve this, but robust evidence on which factors to include is lacking. Therefore, we scoped the literature to identify which potentially prognostic factors may warrant future systematic reviews and meta-analyses. We conducted electronic searches in MEDLINE and Embase to identify studies in English published between 1997 and 2017 that tested the association between healing of the three most common non-traumatic skin ulcers encountered by health care professionals (venous leg, diabetic foot, and pressure ulcers) and patient characteristics, ulcer characteristics, and results from clinical investigations. We included 42 studies that investigated factors which may be associated with the healing of venous leg ulcers (n = 17), diabetic foot ulcers (n = 15), and pressure ulcers (n = 10). Across ulcer types, ulcer characteristics were most commonly reported as potential prognostic factors for healing (n = 37), including the size of the ulcer area (n = 29) and ulcer duration at first assessment (n = 16). A total of 35 studies investigated the prognostic value of patient characteristics (n = 35), including age (n = 31), gender (n = 30), diabetes (n = 22), smoking status (n = 15), and history of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (n = 13). Of these studies, 23 reported results from clinical investigations as potential prognostic factors, with the majority regarding vessel quality. Age, gender, diabetes, smoking status, history of DVT, ulcer area, and ulcer duration at time of first assessment warrant a systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify their prognostic value for delayed ulcer healing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.