Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30821100›Full record

ArticleObesity (Silver Spring, Md.)2019

From Socioeconomic Disadvantage to Obesity: The Mediating Role of Psychological Distress and Emotional Eating.

Jade Spinosa, Paul Christiansen, Joanne M Dickson, Valentina Lorenzetti, Charlotte A Hardman

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
17.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 123 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Gap of women leadership in global obesity research.Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Exposure to PMScientific reports · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jade SpinosaDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0991-3570
Paul ChristiansenDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Joanne M DicksonPsychology Department, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia.
Valentina LorenzettiSchool of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Charlotte A HardmanDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
University of Liverpool · GBAustralian Catholic University · AUEdith Cowan University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveLower socioeconomic status is robustly associated with obesity; however, the underpinning psychological mechanisms remain unclear. The current study sought to determine whether the relationship between lower socioeconomic status and obesity is explained by psychological distress and subsequent emotional eating as a coping strategy. It also examined whether psychological resilience plays a protective role in this pathway.

methodsParticipants (N = 150) from a range of socioeconomic backgrounds completed questionnaire measures of psychological distress, emotional eating, and resilience. They reported their income and education level as an indicator of socioeconomic status and their height and weight in order to calculate BMI.

resultsThere was a significant indirect effect of socioeconomic status on BMI via psychological distress and emotional eating; specifically, lower socioeconomic status was associated with higher distress, higher distress was associated with higher emotional eating, and higher emotional eating was associated with higher BMI (b [SE] = -0.02 [0.01]; 95% CI: -0.04 to -0.01). However, resilience was not a significant moderator of this association.

conclusionsPsychological distress and subsequent emotional eating represent a serial pathway that links lower socioeconomic status with obesity. Targeting these maladaptive coping behaviors may be one strategy to reduce obesity in low-income populations.

Indexed as

Vulnerable PopulationsAdaptation, PsychologicalAdolescentAdultAgedEmotionsFeeding and Eating DisordersFemaleHumansIncomeMaleMiddle AgedObesityPsychological DistressSocial ClassStress, Psychological

Identifiers

PMID30821100
PMCPMC6593860
OpenAlexW2915892183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.