Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30821062›Full record

ArticleTropical medicine & international health : TM & IH2019

Clinical performance among recent graduates in nine low- and middle-income countries.

Todd P Lewis, Sanam Roder-DeWan, Address Malata, Youssoupha Ndiaye, Margaret E Kruk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Developing Research Education Groups in African Cancer Centers: The Experience in Tanzania.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Health system quality in the time of COVID-19.The Lancet. Global health · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Todd P LewisDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Sanam Roder-DeWanDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Address MalataMalawi University of Science and Technology, Limbe, Malawi.
Youssoupha NdiayePlanning, Research, and Statistics, Ministry of Health and Social Action, Dakar, Senegal.
Margaret E KrukDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesRecent studies have identified large and systematic deficits in clinical care in low-income countries that are likely to limit health gains. This has focused attention on effectiveness of pre-service education. One approach to assessing this is observation of clinical performance among recent graduates providing care. However, no studies have assessed performance in a standard manner across countries. We analysed clinical performance among recently graduated providers in nine low- or middle-income countries.

methodsService Provision Assessments from Haiti, Kenya, Malawi, Namibia, Nepal, Rwanda, Senegal, Tanzania, and Uganda were used. We constructed a Good Medical Practice Index that assesses completion of essential clinical actions using direct observations of care (range 0-1), calculated index scores by country and clinical cadre, and assessed the role of facility and clinical characteristics using regression analysis.

resultsOur sample consisted of 2223 clinicians with at least one observation of care. The Good Medical Practice score for the sample was 0.50 (SD = 0.20). Nurses and midwives had the highest score at 0.57 (SD = 0.20), followed by associate clinicians at 0.43 (SD = 0.18), and physicians at 0.42 (SD = 0.16). The average national performance varied from 0.63 (SD = 0.18) in Uganda to 0.39 (SD = 0.17) in Nepal, persisting after adjustment for facility and clinician characteristics.

conclusionsThese results show substantial gaps in clinical performance among recently graduated clinicians, raising concerns about models of clinical education. Competency-based education should be considered to improve quality of care in LMICs. Observations of care offer important insight into the quality of clinical education.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesEducation, MedicalQuality of Health CareAdultAfricaChildChild, PreschoolClinical CompetenceDelivery of Health CareFemaleHaitiHealth Care SurveysHumansIncomeInfantInfant, Newbornclinical performancelow- and middle-income countriespays à revenu faible ou intermédiaireperformance cliniquequalité des soinsquality of care

Identifiers

PMID30821062
PMCPMC6850366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.