Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30820936›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of pharmacology2019

The proteostasis network provides targets for neurodegeneration.

Timothy Mark Newton, James Alex Duce, Elliott David Bayle

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of pharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Quantitative Comparison of HSF1 Activators.Molecular biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Proteostasis and Proteotoxicity in the Network Medicine Era.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Timothy Mark NewtonALBORADA Drug Discovery Institute, University of Cambridge Island Research Building Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0AH, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1818-4023
James Alex DuceALBORADA Drug Discovery Institute, University of Cambridge Island Research Building Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0AH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8762-2245
Elliott David BayleAlzheimer's Research UK UCL Drug Discovery Institute, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7089-3858
University of Cambridge · GBThe Francis Crick Institute · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The production, quality control, and degradation of proteins are a tightly controlled process necessary for cell health. In order to regulate this process, cells rely upon a network of molecular chaperone proteins that bind misfolded proteins and help them fold correctly. In addition, some molecular chaperones can target terminally misfolded proteins for degradation. Neurons are particularly dependent upon this "proteostasis" system, failures in which lead to neurodegenerative disease. In this review, we identify opportunities for modulating molecular chaperone activity with small molecules, which could lower the burden of misfolded protein within neurons, reducing cell death and ameliorating the effects of neurodegeneration. LINKED ARTICLES: This article is part of a themed section on Therapeutics for Dementia and Alzheimer's Disease: New Directions for Precision Medicine. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v176.18/issuetoc.

Indexed as

AnimalsHeat-Shock ProteinsHumansNeurodegenerative DiseasesProteostasisHeat-Shock Proteins

Identifiers

PMID30820936
PMCPMC6715599
OpenAlexW2918277816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.