Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30820926›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2020

Expanding Urgent Oncofertility Services for Reproductive Age Women Remote from a Tertiary Level Fertility Centre by Use of Telemedicine and an On-site Nurse Navigator.

Rhonda Zwingerman, Karen Melenchuk, Eileen McMahon, Kimberly E Liu, Andrew Siren, Nicole Laferriere, Ellen M Greenblatt

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. The Educational Program for Healthcare Providers Regarding Fertility Preservation for Cancer Patients: a Systematic Review.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Non-physician's challenges in sexual and reproductive health care provision for women of reproductive age with cancer: a scoping review of barriers and facilitators.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Nurse navigators' telemonitoring for cancer patients with COVID-19: a French case study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rhonda ZwingermanMount Sinai Fertility, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada. rhonda.zwingerman@sinaihealthsystem.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-6772-4976
Karen MelenchukRegional Cancer Care Northwest, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada.
Eileen McMahonMount Sinai Fertility, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Kimberly E LiuMount Sinai Fertility, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Andrew SirenThunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada.
Nicole LaferriereRegional Cancer Care Northwest, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada.
Ellen M GreenblattMount Sinai Fertility, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to examine a 1-year pilot program aimed at increasing access to fertility preservation (FP) information and services for reproductive-age women newly diagnosed with cancer at a centre geographically remote from a tertiary fertility clinic. An oncofertility nurse navigator (ONN) position was created within the regional cancer centre with the goals of (1) improving local physician knowledge of FP and FP services and (2) improving patient access to FP counselling and services. The ONN identified all women diagnosed with cancer requiring treatment that could impact their fertility and discussed FP options with them and their physicians. As part of a comprehensive program aimed at facilitating access to FP services, the ONN arranged consultations with fertility specialists via telemedicine and coordinated satellite cycle monitoring with a local gynaecologist in order to minimize travel. Patients were surveyed about their reproductive plans, decision-making around FP and experiences with the program. Physicians were surveyed about their engagement with FP services, barriers to FP access and satisfaction with the program. Twenty-two women were eligible for FP during the year-long pilot program. All participated in the study. The most common diagnoses were breast and cervical cancer. At the time of diagnosis, 36.4% of women had no biological children and 68.2% did not desire (more) children. Four women had an FP consultation, and two proceeded with oocyte or embryo cryopreservation. At the end of the pilot program, more physician respondents often or always discussed FP with their patients, stated they frequently refer for FP consultations and stated their patients could obtain FP services in a timely fashion. An ONN within a cancer centre remote from tertiary fertility care can enable access to FP services with minimal need for travel by using local gynaecologic expertise and telemedicine.

Indexed as

AdultCounselingFemaleFertility PreservationHealth PersonnelHumansInfertility, FemaleNeoplasmsPatient NavigationPilot ProjectsPractice Patterns, Physicians'Referral and ConsultationReproductive Health ServicesSurveys and QuestionnairesTelemedicineFertility preservationNurse navigatorOncofertilityTelemedicine

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.