Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30820797›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2019

Nationwide Outcome of Gastrectomy with En-Bloc Partial Pancreatectomy for Gastric Cancer.

L R van der Werf, W J Eshuis, W A Draaisma, B van Etten, S S Gisbertz, E van der Harst, M S L Liem, V E P P Lemmens, B P L Wijnhoven, M G Besselink and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

L R van der WerfDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. L.R.vdwerf@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6880-6612
W J EshuisDepartment of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
W A DraaismaDepartment of Surgery, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, the Netherlands.
B van EttenDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
S S GisbertzDepartment of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
E van der HarstDepartment of Surgery, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
M S L LiemDepartment of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
V E P P LemmensDepartment of Pubic Health, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
B P L WijnhovenDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
M G BesselinkDepartment of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
M I van Berge HenegouwenDepartment of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA) group.
University of Amsterdam · NLErasmus MC · NLMaasstad Ziekenhuis · NLMeander Medisch Centrum · NLNetherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation · NLMedisch Spectrum Twente · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRadical gastrectomy is the cornerstone of the treatment of gastric cancer. For tumors invading the pancreas, en-bloc partial pancreatectomy may be needed for a radical resection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of gastrectomies with partial pancreatectomy for gastric cancer.

methodsPatients who underwent gastrectomy with or without partial pancreatectomy for gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer between 2011 and 2015 were selected from the Dutch Upper GI Cancer Audit (DUCA). Outcomes were resection margin (pR0) and Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III postoperative complications and survival. The association between partial pancreatectomy and postoperative complications was analyzed with multivariable logistic regression. Overall survival of patients with partial pancreatectomy was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

resultsOf 1966 patients that underwent gastrectomy, 55 patients (2.8%) underwent en-bloc partial pancreatectomy. A pR0 resection was achieved in 45 of 55 patients (82% versus 85% in the group without additional resection, P = 0.82). Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III complications occurred in 21 of 55 patients (38% versus 17%, P < 0.001). Median overall survival [95% confidence interval] was 15 [6.8-23.2] months. For patients with and without perioperative systemic therapy, median survival was 20 [12.3-27.7] and 10 [5.7-14.3] months, and for patients with pR0 and pR1 resection, it was 20 [11.8-28.3] and 5 [2.4-7.6] months, respectively.

conclusionsGastrectomy with partial pancreatectomy is not only associated with a pR0 resection rate of 82% but also with increased postoperative morbidity. It should only be performed if a pR0 resection is feasible.

Indexed as

AdultAgedEsophagogastric JunctionFemaleGastrectomyHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingNetherlandsPancreasPancreatectomyPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesStomach NeoplasmsSurvival RateGastrectomyGastric cancerMultiviceral resectionPartial pancreatectomyR0 resection

Identifiers

PMID30820797
PMCPMC6877485
OpenAlexW2920544839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.