Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30820769›Full record

ArticleAnimal cognition2019

Exploratory study of the effects of intra-uterine growth retardation and neonatal energy supplementation of low birth-weight piglets on their post-weaning cognitive abilities.

Océane Schmitt, Keelin O'Driscoll, Emma M Baxter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal cognition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Océane SchmittPig Development Department, Teagasc Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, CoCork, Ireland. schmitt.oce@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4932-3743
Keelin O'DriscollPig Development Department, Teagasc Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, CoCork, Ireland.
Emma M BaxterAnimal Behaviour and Welfare Team, Animal and Veterinary Sciences Research Group, SRUC, West Mains Road, EH9 3JG, Edinburgh, UK.

Funding

Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine 13S428
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study investigated the effects of intra-uterine growth retardation (IUGR, score 0-3; i.e., "normal" to "severe") level at birth, and the effects of neonatal energy supplementation (dosed with 2 ml of coconut oil, commercial product or water, or sham-dosed), on post-weaning cognitive abilities of low birth-weight piglets (< 1.1 kg). In total, 184 piglets were recruited at weaning (27 ± 0.1 days) for habituation to the test procedures, and were either tested for spatial learning and memory in a T-maze (n = 42; 37 ± 0.5 days) or for short-term memory in a spontaneous object recognition task (SORT; n = 47; 41 ± 0.3 days). Neonatal supplementation did not affect performances of pigs in the T-maze task or SORT. IUGR3 pigs tended to be faster to enter the reward arm and to obtain the reward in the reversal step of the T-Maze task, suggesting a better learning flexibility, compared to IUGR1 (entry t

Indexed as

Animals, NewbornCognitionFetal Growth RetardationAnimalsDietary SupplementsMemorySwineWeaningEnergy supplementationHabituationIUGRLearningMemoryPigs

Identifiers

PMID30820769
PMCPMC6459783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.