ReviewDer Radiologe2019
[Differential diagnoses of biliary tract diseases : Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging].
Review in Der Radiologe, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Surgical approach to benign bile duct alterations].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2020Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
clinical/methodical issueBile duct diseases can be found in all age groups and show an increased prevalence in northern Europe. Pathologies range from benign diseases to malignant tumors with very poor survival. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL
methodsMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) are the radiological methods of choice for a detailed evaluation of the bile duct system in addition to sonography. By assessing the lumen and the wall of the bile ducts as well as the surrounding structures, both obstructive and nonobstructive pathologies can be diagnosed and differentiated with high sensitivity and specificity. METHODICAL INNOVATIONS: Technical developments with postprocessing modalities as well as the use of biliary-excreted liver-specific MR contrast agents improve the diagnosis of bile duct diseases and enable morphological and functional assessment. PERFORMANCE: Due to high patient tolerance, minimal procedural risk in contrast to invasive endoscopic methods and the possibility of three-dimensional post-processing, beside CT, MRI with magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) represents the method of choice in patients with sonographically or clinically suspected bile duct disease and has significantly reduced the indications of diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). A complementary multimodality and multiparametric imaging approach is particularly helpful for preoperative assessment. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: Rapidly evolving technology for both MRI and CT represent opportunities and challenges. By understanding the advantages and limitations of modern MR and CT techniques and by knowing the spectrum of bile duct pathologies, improved diagnosis and narrowing of possible differential diagnosis can be achieved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.