Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30820600›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2019

Posterior condylar bone resection and femoral implant thickness vary by up to 3 mm across implant systems: implications for flexion gap balancing.

Cynthia A Kahlenberg, Shady Elmasry, David J Mayman, Michael B Cross, Timothy M Wright, Geoffrey H Westrich, Peter K Sculco

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cynthia A KahlenbergDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA. kahlenbergc@hss.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3852-2926
Shady ElmasryDepartment of Biomechanics, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
David J MaymanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
Michael B CrossDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
Timothy M WrightDepartment of Biomechanics, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
Geoffrey H WestrichDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
Peter K SculcoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
Hospital for Special Surgery · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the thickness of medial and lateral posterior femoral condylar bone resected with five implant systems using posterior referencing jigs set at 3° of external rotation. The hypothesis was that posterior condylar resection thickness on the medial side would be equal to the thickness of the femoral implant posteriorly, regardless of implant system.

methodsPosterior referencing femoral sizers were used on right femur sawbones models for five different implant systems. Each sawbones model was sized using a femoral sizer for the specific implant system. Sizing guides were set at 3° of external rotation for the right femur. Each system's 4-in-1 cutting block was then used to make posterior condylar cuts. The thicknesses of the cut bones were measured using a manual calliper.

resultsThe amount of bone resected from both medial (P = 0.0004) and lateral (P < 0.0001) posterior condyles differed significantly across the five implant systems. The mean thickness of bone resected from the posteromedial femoral condyle ranged from 9.4 ± 0.5 to 12.4 ± 0.9 mm. The mean thickness of the posterolateral condyle cut ranged from 6.7 ± 0.6 to 10.2 ± 0.3 mm. The difference in thicknesses between the bone resection from the posteromedial condyle and the implant thickness of the posterior condyles ranged from 0.6 to 2.9 mm.

conclusionsThe thickness of bone removed from the posterior femoral condyles varied by up to 3 mm across the five TKA implant systems. For each system, the posteromedial condyle resection was larger than the thickness of the posterior condyle of the actual implant. As the difference between the posterior bone resection and the implant thickness increases, the flexion gap will likely loosen and should be accounted for during gap balancing. In commonly used knee implant systems, resected bone is greater than implant thickness and may lead to flexion instability.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeFemurHumansKnee JointKnee ProsthesisRange of Motion, ArticularRotationBone resectionFlexion gapImplant designLigament balancingPosterior condylar resection

Identifiers

PMID30820600
OpenAlexW2920180565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.