ReviewDer Internist2019
[Telemedicine in heart failure].
Review in Der Internist, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feasibility, Adherence, Acceptance and Usability of a Multimodal Telemonitoring for Pediatric Post-COVID Syndrome: A Bicentric Pilot Study.Journal of medical systems · 2026Article
- The Narrative Review: Advancements in Heart Failure Diagnosis and Management using Artificial Intelligence: A New Era of Patient Care.Current cardiology reviews · 2026Review
- Feasibility, utility, usability and acceptance of a multimodal telemonitoring for COVID-19 patients in general practitioners practices in Germany: a mixed methods study with patients.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- [Telemedicine].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Review
- Collaboration amongst general practitioners and gynaecologists working in primary health care in Germany: a cross-sectional study.Primary health care research & development · 2021Article
- Status of Telemonitoring Services in Diabetes Care in Germany: A Narrative Review.Telemedicine reports · 2021Review
- [Constellations of findings and derived treatment interventions in telemedical monitoring of patients with heart failure, cardiac arrhythmia or increased risk for sudden cardiac death : Recommendations of the working group 33 telemonitoring of the German Cardiac Society].Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Improved outpatient care of heart failure patients is considered crucial to avoiding unplanned cardiovascular hospitalizations and reducing mortality. Making up for regional and rural differences in heart failure care poses a further challenge. Telemedical care as a supplement to outpatient point-of-care medicine by the general practitioner and medical specialist is considered relevant to implementing this goal. This article presents the technical and organizational basics of telemedical methods in outpatient heart failure care. Current evidence on the efficacy of telemedical co-management is also explained based on the results from the nine most important randomized studies on telemedicine in heart failure. Particular attention is paid to the TIM-HF2 study published in 2018, which showed the superiority of telemedical co-management in terms of mortality and morbidity following recent hospitalization for heart failure. Pre-stratified subgroup analysis revealed no significant interactions in terms of the primary endpoint between urban and rural regions. Scalability is required in order to translate the telemedical study concept from TIM-HF2 to a nationwide care program for all patients in Germany. Telemed5000 is the first project to set its goal as the development of a telemedicine center for the telemedical co-management of up to 5000 patients using artificial intelligence. It is being funded by the Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology for the period 2019-2022.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30820589What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.