Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30820351›Full record

ArticleNPJ systems biology and applications2019

Synergy from gene expression and network mining (SynGeNet) method predicts synergistic drug combinations for diverse melanoma genomic subtypes.

Kelly E Regan-Fendt, Jielin Xu, Mallory DiVincenzo, Megan C Duggan, Reena Shakya, Ryejung Na, William E Carson, Philip R O Payne, Fuhai Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ systems biology and applications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. HANSynergy: Heterogeneous Graph Attention Network for Drug Synergy Prediction.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Construction and contextualization approaches for protein-protein interaction networks.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Machine learning in the prediction of cancer therapy.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kelly E Regan-FendtDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Jielin XuDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Mallory DiVincenzoComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Megan C DugganComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Reena ShakyaTarget Validation Shared Resource, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Ryejung NaTarget Validation Shared Resource, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
William E CarsonComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Philip R O PayneInstitute for Informatics, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Fuhai LiInstitute for Informatics, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA. Fuhai.Li@wustl.edu.

Funding

Translational Therapeutics Research Program (TT)P30CA016058 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Jennifer A. Woyach · 1985 to 2026
$132.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016058
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systems biology perspectives are crucial for understanding the pathophysiology of complex diseases, and therefore hold great promise for the discovery of novel treatment strategies. Drug combinations have been shown to improve durability and reduce resistance to available first-line therapies in a variety of cancers; however, traditional drug discovery approaches are prohibitively cost and labor-intensive to evaluate large-scale matrices of potential drug combinations. Computational methods are needed to efficiently model complex interactions of drug target pathways and identify mechanisms underlying drug combination synergy. In this study, we employ a computational approach, SynGeNet (Synergy from Gene expression and Network mining), which integrates transcriptomics-based connectivity mapping and network centrality analysis to analyze disease networks and predict drug combinations. As an exemplar of a disease in which combination therapies demonstrate efficacy in genomic-specific contexts, we investigate malignant melanoma. We employed SynGeNet to generate drug combination predictions for each of the four major genomic subtypes of melanoma (BRAF, NRAS, NF1, and triple wild type) using publicly available gene expression and mutation data. We validated synergistic drug combinations predicted by our method across all genomic subtypes using results from a high-throughput drug screening study across. Finally, we prospectively validated the drug combination for

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsComputational BiologyCutaneous Malignant MelanomaDatabases, GeneticDrug CombinationsDrug DiscoveryDrug Resistance, NeoplasmDrug SynergismGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenomicsHumansMelanomaMiceMutationSkin NeoplasmsDrug Combinations

Identifiers

PMID30820351
PMCPMC6391384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.