Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30820331›Full record

ArticleObesity science & practice2019

Patient perception and approval of faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) as an alternative treatment option for obesity.

F Gundling, S Roggenbrod, S Schleifer, M Sohn, W Schepp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity science & practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Awareness and acceptability of gut microbiome transfer.Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Storage of soil microbiome for application in sustainable agriculture: prospects and challenges.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

F GundlingDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, Academic Teaching Hospital Bogenhausen Technical University of Munich Munich Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8771-2996
S RoggenbrodDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, Academic Teaching Hospital Bogenhausen Technical University of Munich Munich Germany.
S SchleiferDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, Academic Teaching Hospital Bogenhausen Technical University of Munich Munich Germany.
M SohnDepartment of Visceral Surgery, Academic Teaching Hospital Bogenhausen Technical University of Munich Munich Germany.
W ScheppDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, Academic Teaching Hospital Bogenhausen Technical University of Munich Munich Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) represents a treatment option for some diseases, e.g. recurring Clostridium difficile-associated colitis. However, there is also evidence that FMT can be effective in treating obesity. This pilot study established the approval and willingness of obese patients to undergo FMT.

methodsWe conducted a survey of adults with obesity using a questionnaire containing 21 both multiple choice and open questions was dispatched to a cohort of 101 persons with obesity. It included questions aiming at the process of FMT itself, donors as well as possible concerns. Additionally aspects of social background and disease activity were dealt with.

resultsThe response rate amounted to 30.1% (

conclusionFor the majority of the persons with obesity surveyed FMT represents a treatment option. Approximately two thirds of the questionees would consider FMT as an alternative treatment option, even in spite of a satisfactory disease response to current standard therapies. Unsurprisingly there are concerns in regard to the transmission of possible infectious agents as well as to the hygieneic implementation of FMT itself.

Indexed as

Fecal microbiota transfermicrobiota obesityweight loss endoscopy trial (WET)

Identifiers

PMID30820331
PMCPMC6381400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.