Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30820316›Full record

ArticleChiropractic & manual therapies2019

Chiropractic conservatism and the ability to determine contra-indications, non-indications, and indications to chiropractic care: a cross-sectional survey of chiropractic students.

Guillaume Goncalves, Marine Demortier, Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde, Niels Wedderkopp

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chiropractic & manual therapies, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Misinformation, chiropractic, and the COVID-19 pandemic.Chiropractic & manual therapies · 2020
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Guillaume Goncalves1CIAMS, University of Paris-Sud, University of Paris-Saclay, F- 91405 Orsay Cedex, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1992-1876
Marine Demortier1CIAMS, University of Paris-Sud, University of Paris-Saclay, F- 91405 Orsay Cedex, France.
Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde1CIAMS, University of Paris-Sud, University of Paris-Saclay, F- 91405 Orsay Cedex, France.
Niels Wedderkopp4Institute for Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark.
Université Paris-Sud · FRUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: While there is a broad spectrum of practice within chiropractic two sub-types can be identified, those who focus on musculoskeletal problems and those who treat also non-musculoskeletal problems. The latter group may adhere to the old conservative 'subluxation' model. The main goal of this study is to determine if chiropractic students with such conservative opinions are likely to have a different approach to determine Method: An anonymous and voluntary survey on 3rd to 6th year French chiropractic students was conducted between November 2017 and January 2018. Level of chiropractic conservatism (10 items) and the ability to determine Results: In all, 359 of 536 (67%) students responded to the questionnaire. They generally recognized a number of Conclusion: It is concerning that students who adhere to the subluxation model are prepared to 'operationalize' their conservative opinions in their future scope of practice; apparently willing to treat asymptomatic people with chiropractic adjustments. The determinants of this phenomenon need to be understood.

Indexed as

AdultChiropracticClinical CompetenceConservative TreatmentCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleManipulation, ChiropracticStudents, MedicalSurveys and QuestionnairesChiropractic studentsConservatismContra-indicationIndicationNon-indicationSubluxationSurvey

Identifiers

PMID30820316
PMCPMC6379950
OpenAlexW2941703192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.