ArticleMedical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre2019
Microcomputed Tomography Calibration Using Polymers and Minerals for Enamel Mineral Content Quantitation.
Article in Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Characterization of Enamel and Dentine about a White Spot Lesion: Mechanical Properties, Mineral Density, Microstructure and Molecular Composition.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this paper was to develop calibration standards (CSs) that are readily available for clinical researchers for the quantitation of enamel mineral content.
methodPolyethylene terephthalate (PET), acetal, polyphenylene sulfide (PPS), selenite, Egyptian alabaster, aragonite, and fluorite were fashioned into discs, and their densities were measured and stacked for microcomputed tomography examination. Frame averaging, flat-field correction, pre-filtration, and beam-hardening correction were applied. CSs were checked for homogeneity. The linear relationship between the mean greyscale value (GSV) of each disc and its physically calculated density was explored, and reproducibility was tested. A calibration function was established and then validated using a bovine enamel disc and sound enamel of extracted human premolar teeth.
resultsMeasured densities were PET (ρ = 1.38 g/cm3), acetal (ρ = 1.41 g/cm3), PPS (ρ = 1.64 g/cm3), selenite (ρ = 2.24 g/cm3), Egyptian alabaster (ρ = 2.7 g/cm3), aragonite (ρ = 2.72 g/cm3), and fluorite (ρ = 3.11 g/cm3). Examination of the profile sections of CSs confirmed the uniformity of GSVs with minimal beam-hardening effect. A squared Pearson correlation coefficient of R2 = 0.994 was determined between the mean GSV of each CS and its calculated density and was reproduced at different settings with R2 >0.99. A linear regression equation of density (y) versus GSV (x) was established using the least squares regression equation method. The estimated density of the bovine enamel disc (2.48 g/cm3) showed high accuracy when compared to the physically measured value (2.45 g/cm3). The -relative error was 1.2%. Densities of sound enamel in the extracted human premolar teeth were 2.6-3.1 g/cm3.
conclusionsThis is a simple, valid, and reproducible method to quantitate enamel mineral content. This simple, yet accurate system could be used to expand knowledge in the field of enamel caries research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.