Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30819889›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

Long-term population spike-timing-dependent plasticity promotes synaptic tagging but not cross-tagging in rat hippocampal area CA1.

Karen Ka Lam Pang, Mahima Sharma, Kumar Krishna-K, Thomas Behnisch, Sreedharan Sajikumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. An integratediScience · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Synapses tagged, memories kept: synaptic tagging and capture hypothesis in brain health and disease.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. The Mechanical Basis of Memory - the MeshCODE Theory.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  13. Induction of activity synchronization among primed hippocampal neurons out of random dynamics is key for trace memory formation and retrieval.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Karen Ka Lam PangDepartment of Physiology, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117593.
Mahima SharmaDepartment of Physiology, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117593.
Kumar Krishna-KDepartment of Physiology, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117593.
Thomas BehnischInstitutes of Brain Science, State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology, Ministry of Education Frontiers Centre for Brain Science, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, People's Republic of China behnish@fudan.edu.cn phssks@nus.edu.sg.ORCID 0000-0002-7842-3252
Sreedharan SajikumarDepartment of Physiology, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117593; behnish@fudan.edu.cn phssks@nus.edu.sg.ORCID 0000-0002-5761-8982

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP), the direction and degree of synaptic modification are determined by the coherence of pre- and postsynaptic activities within a neuron. However, in the adult rat hippocampus, it remains unclear whether STDP-like mechanisms in a neuronal population induce synaptic potentiation of a long duration. Thus, we asked whether the magnitude and maintenance of synaptic plasticity in a population of CA1 neurons differ as a function of the temporal order and interval between pre- and postsynaptic activities. Modulation of the relative timing of Schaffer collateral fibers (presynaptic component) and CA1 axons (postsynaptic component) stimulations resulted in an asymmetric population STDP (pSTDP). The resulting potentiation in response to 20 pairings at 1 Hz was largest in magnitude and most persistent (4 h) when presynaptic activity coincided with or preceded postsynaptic activity. Interestingly, when postsynaptic activation preceded presynaptic stimulation by 20 ms, an immediate increase in field excitatory postsynaptic potentials was observed, but it eventually transformed into a synaptic depression. Furthermore, pSTDP engaged in selective forms of late-associative activity: It facilitated the maintenance of tetanization-induced early long-term potentiation (LTP) in neighboring synapses but not early long-term depression, reflecting possible mechanistic differences with classical tetanization-induced LTP. The data demonstrate that a pairing of pre- and postsynaptic activities in a neuronal population can greatly reduce the required number of synaptic plasticity-evoking events and induce a potentiation of a degree and duration similar to that with repeated tetanization. Thus, pSTDP determines synaptic efficacy in the hippocampal CA3-CA1 circuit and could bias the CA1 neuronal population toward potentiation in future events.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsCA1 Region, HippocampalElectric StimulationExcitatory Postsynaptic PotentialsHippocampusLong-Term PotentiationMaleNeuronal PlasticityNeuronsPatch-Clamp TechniquesRatsRats, WistarSynapsesTemporal Lobearea CA1STDPsynaptic capturesynaptic plasticitysynaptic tagging

Identifiers

PMID30819889
PMCPMC6431168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.