Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30819823›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2019

Usefulness Criterion and Post-selection Parental Contributions in Multi-parental Crosses: Application to Polygenic Trait Introgression.

Antoine Allier, Laurence Moreau, Alain Charcosset, Simon Teyssèdre, Christina Lehermeier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Rapid cycling genomic selection in maize landraces.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Antoine AllierGQE - Le Moulon, INRA, Univ. Paris-Sud, CNRS, AgroParisTech, Univ. Paris-Saclay, 91190 Gif-sur-Yvette, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6578-1715
Laurence MoreauGQE - Le Moulon, INRA, Univ. Paris-Sud, CNRS, AgroParisTech, Univ. Paris-Saclay, 91190 Gif-sur-Yvette, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7195-1327
Alain CharcossetGQE - Le Moulon, INRA, Univ. Paris-Sud, CNRS, AgroParisTech, Univ. Paris-Saclay, 91190 Gif-sur-Yvette, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6125-503X
Simon TeyssèdreRAGT 2n, Genetics and Analytics Unit, 12510 Druelle, France clehermeier@ragt.fr steyssedre@ragt.fr.
Christina LehermeierRAGT 2n, Genetics and Analytics Unit, 12510 Druelle, France clehermeier@ragt.fr steyssedre@ragt.fr.ORCID 0000-0001-7724-0887

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predicting the usefulness of crosses in terms of expected genetic gain and genetic diversity is of interest to secure performance in the progeny and to maintain long-term genetic gain in plant breeding. A wide range of crossing schemes are possible including large biparental crosses, backcrosses, four-way crosses, and synthetic populations.

Indexed as

Crosses, GeneticModels, GeneticPlant BreedingSelection, GeneticAlgorithmsGenetics, PopulationGenetic VariationGenome, PlantGenomicsQuantitative Trait LociReproducibility of Resultsgenome-wide predictionGenomic PredictionGenPredmulti-parental crossesparental genome contributionprogeny varianceShared Data Resources

Identifiers

PMID30819823
PMCPMC6505154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.