Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30819822›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2019

An R Package for Bayesian Analysis of Multi-environment and Multi-trait Multi-environment Data for Genome-Based Prediction.

Osval A Montesinos-López, Abelardo Montesinos-López, Francisco Javier Luna-Vázquez, Fernando H Toledo, Paulino Pérez-Rodríguez, Morten Lillemo, José Crossa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Overview of Major Computer Packages for Genomic Prediction of Complex Traits.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Osval A Montesinos-LópezFacultad de Telemática, Universidad de Colima, Colima, Colima, 28040, México.
Abelardo Montesinos-LópezDepartamento de Matemáticas, Centro Universitario de Ciencias Exactas e Ingenierías, (CUCEI), Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Jalisco, 44430, México j.crossa@cgiar.org aml_uach@hotmail.com.
Francisco Javier Luna-VázquezFacultad de Telemática, Universidad de Colima, Colima, Colima, 28040, México.
Fernando H ToledoBiometrics and Statistics Unit, International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center, (CIMMYT), Apdo. Postal 6-641, Ciudad de México, 06600, México.
Paulino Pérez-RodríguezColegio de Postgraduados, CP 56230, Montecillos, Edo. de México, México.
Morten LillemoDepartment of Plant Sciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, IHA/CIGENE, P.O. Box 5003, NO-1432 Ås, Norway.
José CrossaBiometrics and Statistics Unit, International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center, (CIMMYT), Apdo. Postal 6-641, Ciudad de México, 06600, México j.crossa@cgiar.org aml_uach@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-9429-5855

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence that genomic selection (GS) is a technology that is revolutionizing plant breeding continues to grow. However, it is very well documented that its success strongly depends on statistical models, which are used by GS to perform predictions of candidate genotypes that were not phenotyped. Because there is no universally better model for prediction and models for each type of response variable are needed (continuous, binary, ordinal, count, etc.), an active area of research aims to develop statistical models for the prediction of univariate and multivariate traits in GS. However, most of the models developed so far are for univariate and continuous (Gaussian) traits. Therefore, to overcome the lack of multivariate statistical models for genome-based prediction by improving the original version of the BMTME, we propose an improved Bayesian multi-trait and multi-environment (BMTME) R package for analyzing breeding data with multiple traits and multiple environments. We also introduce Bayesian multi-output regressor stacking (BMORS) functions that are considerably efficient in terms of computational resources. The package allows parameter estimation and evaluates the prediction performance of multi-trait and multi-environment data in a reliable, efficient and user-friendly way. We illustrate the use of the BMTME with real toy datasets to show all the facilities that the software offers the user. However, for large datasets, the BME() and BMTME() functions of the BMTME R package are very intense in terms of computing time; on the other hand, less intensive computing is required with BMORS functions BMORS() and BMORS_Env() that are also included in the BMTME package.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremGene-Environment InteractionQuantitative Trait, HeritableSoftwareAlgorithmsComputational BiologyGenomicsModels, StatisticalZea maysgenome-based prediction and selectionGenomic PredictionGenPredmulti-environmentmulti-traitmultivariate analysisR-softwareShared data resources

Identifiers

PMID30819822
PMCPMC6505148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.