ArticleBMJ open2019
Identifying gaps in primary healthcare policy and governance in low-income and middle-income countries: protocol for an evidence gap map.
Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Choice of primary healthcare providers among population in urban areas of low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of literature.BMC primary care · 2026Pooled it
- Public administration and health system strengthening in low- and middle-income countries: exploring strategies to improve healthcare delivery and health governance.Frontiers in health services · 2026Review
- Costs of outpatient services at selected primary healthcare centers in Bangladesh: A cross-sectional study.PloS one · 2025Article
- Unlocking potential: innovative "private-non-profit" partnership for empowering children with disabilities in resource-limited settings in Nepal.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Choice of primary healthcare providers among population in urban areas of low- and middle-income countries-a protocol for systematic review of literature.Systematic reviews · 2024Article
- Primary Mental Health Care in a New Era.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Do Migration Characteristics Influence the Utilization of Basic Public Health Services in Internal Elderly Migrants in China?Frontiers in public health · 2021Article
- Factors influencing utilization of primary health care by elderly internal migrants in China: the role of social contacts.BMC public health · 2020Article
- Using mobile phones to improve community health workers performance in low-and-middle-income countries.BMC public health · 2020Article
- Primary healthcare policy and governance in low-income and middle-income countries: an evidence gap map.BMJ global health · 2019Article
- What kind of evidence do we need to strengthen primary healthcare in the 21st century?BMJ global health · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThere are gaps in the primary healthcare (PHC) delivery in majority of low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) due to epidemiological transition, emergence of outbreaks or war, and often lack of governance. In LMICs, governance is always a less focused aspect, and often limited to the role of the authority despite potential contribution of other actors. It is evident that community engagement and social mobilisation of health service delivery result in better health outcomes. Even in case of systems failure, the need for PHC services is satisfied by individuals and communities in LMICs. Available evidence including systematic reviews on PHC governance is mostly from high-income countries and there is limited work in LMICs. This evidence gap map (EGM) is a systematic exploration to identify evidence gaps in PHC policy and governance in this region. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Different bibliographic databases were explored to retrieve available studies considering the time period between 1980 and 2017, and these were independently screened by two reviewers. Screened articles will be considered for full-text extraction based on prespecified criteria for inclusion and exclusion. A modified SURE (Supporting the Use of Research Evidence) checklist will be used to assess the quality of included systematic reviews. Overview of the findings will be provided in synthesised form. Identified interventions and outcomes will be plotted in a dynamic platform to develop a gap map. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Findings of the EGM will be published in a peer-reviewed journal in a separate manuscript. This EGM aims to explore the evidence gaps in PHC policy and governance in LMICs. Findings from the EGM will highlight the gaps in PHC to guide policy makers and researchers for future research planning and development of national strategies. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018096883.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.