Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30819704›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Competing needs: a qualitative study of cervical cancer screening attendance among HPV-positive women in Tanzania.

Ditte Søndergaard Linde, Vibeke Rasch, Julius D Mwaiselage, Tine M Gammeltoft

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02509702 (Text Messages to Increase Attendance to Follow-up Cervical Cancer Screening Appointments Among HPV Positive Tanzanian Women), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02509702 nacompletednot on this map

Text Messages to Increase Attendance to Follow-up Cervical Cancer Screening Appointments Among HPV Positive Tanzanian Women (Connected2Care)

TypeinterventionalSponsorMarianne AndersenRan2015 to 2019Enrolled705ConditionsCervical CancerArmsConnected to Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Exploring Recent Trends in Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake in Tanzania.The East African health research journal · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ditte Søndergaard LindeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-0851-6760
Vibeke RaschDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Julius D MwaiselageDepartment for Cancer Prevention Services, Ocean Road Cancer Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Tine M GammeltoftDepartment of Anthropology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
University of Southern Denmark · DKOcean Road Cancer Institute · TZUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study was to understand causes of attendance and non-attendance to a follow-up cervical cancer screening among human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive women.

designSemistructured, individual interviews with HPV-positive women and cervical cancer screening nurses. The interview guide and initial data analysis were guided by existing health behaviour theories. However, as the theories limited the potential of the data material, a grounded theory framework guided the final data analysis.

settingInterviews were conducted in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, at Ocean Road Cancer Institute (ORCI) or in the homes of screening clients.

participants15 interviews were conducted with women who had tested HPV-positive during a patient-initiated screening and been appointed for a follow-up screening 14 months later. Nine women had not attended the follow-up appointment, four had delayed attendance and two had attended on the scheduled date. Further, individual interviews were conducted with the two nurses working at ORCI's screening clinic.

resultsPerceived benefits for attending a patient-initiated screening include treatment of gynaecological symptoms and prevention of disease. The key perceived benefit of a health provider-initiated follow-up screening is prevention, which is challenged by the circumstance that it is seen by women as having merely potential benefit and therefore can be postponed when competing needs are present. Perceived challenges for screening attendance include emotional costs, in the form of fear of the disease, fear of the gynaecological examination as well as direct and indirect economic costs, such as transportation costs, lost income and waiting time.

conclusionCervical cancer screening is one among many tasks that women living in a low-income setting must attend to. Since health provider-initiated follow-up screening is seen as having only potential benefit, attendance can be postponed when competing needs exist. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02509702.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPapillomavirus InfectionsPreventive Health ServicesQualitative ResearchReminder SystemsTanzaniaUterine Cervical Neoplasmsbehaviourcervical cancerHPVinterviewsscreeningTanzania

Identifiers

PMID30819704
PMCPMC6398757
OpenAlexW2917387178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.