ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2019
Pre-hospital advanced airway management for adults with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: nationwide cohort study.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed, 93 citations in OpenAlex.
- Does the effectiveness of advanced airway management depend on initial cardiac arrest rhythm? A secondary analysis of the pragmatic airway resuscitation trial.Resuscitation · 2025Trial
- External validation of the Prehospital Return of Spontaneous Circulation (P-ROSC) score for predicting prehospital return of spontaneous circulation among patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
- Factors influencing the prognosis of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: an analysis of the Utstein Registry in Aichi, Japan.BMC emergency medicine · 2026Observational
- The association of prehospital advanced airway management time and outcome in out-of hospital cardiac arrest patients.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Intra-arrest transport versus continued on-scene resuscitation in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest by first documented rhythm: a nationwide cohort study using time-dependent propensity score sequential matching.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Article
- Association between endotracheal intubation and outcomes of nonshockable out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Japan.BMC emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the optimal timing for advanced airway management for adult patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A retrospective observational study from a multicenter registry.Resuscitation plus · 2025Article
- Cardiac arrest: Pre-hospital strategies to facilitate successful resuscitation and improve recovery rates.World journal of cardiology · 2025Review
- Resuscitation Attempt and Outcomes in Patients With Asystole Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Association between sub-phenotypes identified using latent class analysis and neurological outcomes in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Japan.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2024Article
- Survival After Intra-Arrest Transport vs On-Scene Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Children.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Differences in Pathophysiology and Treatment Efficacy Based on Heterogeneous Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
- Overview and future prospects of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest registries in Japan.Resuscitation plus · 2024Review
- Sequence of Epinephrine and Advanced Airway Placement After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- In-hospital extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: an analysis by time-dependent propensity score matching using a nationwide database in Japan.Critical care (London, England) · 2023Article
- Establishment of a prediction model for prehospital return of spontaneous circulation in out-of-hospital patients with cardiac arrest.World journal of cardiology · 2023Article
- Pre-hospital airway management and neurological status of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A retrospective cohort study.Resuscitation plus · 2023Article
- Sex- and Age-Based Disparities in Public Access Defibrillation, Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, and Neurological Outcome in Cardiac Arrest.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- A pilot, prospective trial of IntuBrite® versus Macintosh direct laryngoscopy for paramedic endotracheal intubation in out of hospital cardiac arrest.BMC emergency medicine · 2023Article
- The impact of time to amiodarone administration on survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.Resuscitation plus · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine survival associated with advanced airway management (AAM) compared with no AAM for adults with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
designCohort study between January 2014 and December 2016.
settingNationwide, population based registry in Japan (All-Japan Utstein Registry).
participantsConsecutive adult patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, separated into two sub-cohorts by their first documented electrocardiographic rhythm: shockable (ventricular fibrillation or pulseless ventricular tachycardia) and non-shockable (pulseless electrical activity or asystole). Patients who received AAM during cardiopulmonary resuscitation were sequentially matched with patients at risk of AAM within the same minute on the basis of time dependent propensity scores.
main outcome measuresSurvival at one month or at hospital discharge within one month.
resultsOf the 310 620 patients eligible, 8459 (41.2%) of 20 516 in the shockable cohort and 121 890 (42.0%) of 290 104 in the non-shockable cohort received AAM during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. After time dependent propensity score sequential matching, 16 114 patients in the shockable cohort and 236 042 in the non-shockable cohort were matched at the same minute. In the shockable cohort, survival did not differ between patients with AAM and those with no AAM: 1546/8057 (19.2%) versus 1500/8057 (18.6%) (adjusted risk ratio 1.00, 95% confidence interval 0.93 to 1.07). In the non-shockable cohort, patients with AAM had better survival than those with no AAM: 2696/118 021 (2.3%) versus 2127/118 021 (1.8%) (adjusted risk ratio 1.27, 1.20 to 1.35).
conclusionsIn the time dependent propensity score sequential matching for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in adults, AAM was not associated with survival among patients with shockable rhythm, whereas AAM was associated with better survival among patients with non-shockable rhythm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.