ReviewSchizophrenia research2020
P300 as an index of transition to psychosis and of remission: Data from a clinical high risk for psychosis study and review of literature.
Review in Schizophrenia research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Evaluation of Event-Related Potentials in Somatic Diseases - Systematic Review.Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback · 2024Pooled it
- EEG-Based Measures in At-Risk Mental State and Early Stages of Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021Pooled it
- Visual P300 and Risk for Psychosis Onset in Youth at Clinical High Risk.Biological psychiatry · 2026Article
- Predictors and Moderators of Long-Term Outcome of Persons at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis: Methods and Preliminary Data.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2026Article
- Associations between attenuated auditory p300 event-related potential and cognitive basic symptoms in young people at clinical high risk for psychosis.Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2025Article
- The electroencephalography protocol for the Accelerating Medicines Partnership® Schizophrenia Program: Reliability and stability of measures.Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Cognitive assessment in the Accelerating Medicines Partnership® Schizophrenia Program: harmonization priorities and strategies in a diverse international sample.Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Reduced Cerebellar Volumes Associate with P300 Amplitude Attenuation in Children with Clinical High Risk for Psychosis and Early Onset Psychosis.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2025Article
- Advancements and Future Directions in Prevention Based on Evaluation for Individuals With Clinical High Risk of Psychosis: Insights From the SHARP Study.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2025Review
- Neurocognitive Deficits in Individuals at Ultra-High-Risk for Psychosis: An Overview of Systematic Reviews.Iranian journal of psychiatry · 2025Review
- P300 in schizophrenia: Then and now.Biological psychology · 2024Review
- Biomarkers for Psychosis: Are We There Yet? Umbrella Review of 1478 Biomarkers.Schizophrenia bulletin open · 2024Article
- Comprehensive review of multidimensional biomarkers in the ShangHai At Risk for Psychosis (SHARP) program for early psychosis identification.PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2023Review
- Value of P300 amplitude in the diagnosis of untreated first-episode schizophrenia and psychosis risk syndrome in children and adolescents.BMC psychiatry · 2023Article
- Eye movement indices as predictors of conversion to psychosis in individuals at clinical high risk.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2023Article
- Neural Circuitry of Salience and Reward Processing in Psychosis.Biological psychiatry global open science · 2023Review
- A redux of schizophrenia research in 2021.Schizophrenia research · 2022Article
- Neurophysiology in psychosis: The quest for disease biomarkers.Translational psychiatry · 2022Review
- Individualized Prediction of Prodromal Symptom Remission for Youth at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2022Article
- Prolonged P300 Latency in Antipsychotic-Free Subjects with At-Risk Mental States Who Later Developed Schizophrenia.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Auditory P300 oddball and novel components index working memory operations and salience processing, respectively, and are regarded as biomarkers of neurocognitive changes in both chronic and first-episode schizophrenia. Much less is known about whether P300 abnormalities exist in individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR) and if they are predictors of both transition to psychosis and remission from symptoms. One hundred and four CHR and 69 healthy control individuals (HC) completed P300 oddball paradigm, and 131 CHR and 69 HC subjects completed P300 novel paradigm. All CHR subjects were followed up for one year and stratified into CHR converters (CHRC) and non-converters (CHR-NC), with CHR-NC further stratified into remitted and non-remitted subgroups. Between-group comparisons of P300 oddball and novel amplitude and latency were performed among CHRC, CHR-NC and HC, as well as among CHRC, non-remitted CHR, remitted CHR and HC. CHR converters had lower fronto-central P300 novel amplitude as well as marginally lower P300 oddball amplitude relative to HC. When CHR non-converters were stratified into remitted and non-remitted subgroups, P300 novel amplitude in remitted CHR subjects was comparable to HC, and it was higher than that in CHR subjects who converted to psychosis or who did not remit. Thus, reduced P300 novel amplitude indexing impaired salience processing marked both conversion to psychosis and remission from psychotic symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.