Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30819409›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of hand surgery2019

Evaluation of Version 2.0 of the PROMIS Upper Extremity Computer Adaptive Test in Nonshoulder Upper Extremity Patients.

Andrew R Tyser, Man Hung, Jerry Bounsanga, Maren W Voss, Nikolas H Kazmers

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of hand surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrew R TyserDepartment of Orthopaedics, Salt Lake City, UT.
Man HungDepartment of Orthopaedics, Salt Lake City, UT; Division of Public Health, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Jerry BounsangaDepartment of Orthopaedics, Salt Lake City, UT.
Maren W VossDepartment of Orthopaedics, Salt Lake City, UT.
Nikolas H KazmersDepartment of Orthopaedics, Salt Lake City, UT. Electronic address: nkazmers@gmail.com.

Funding

Improving Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Orthopaedic Research and PracticeU01AR067138 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI HUNG, MAN · 2014 to 2016
$590k
NIAMS NIH HHS U01 AR067138
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity Computer Adaptive Test (UE CAT) was recently updated to version 2.0 (v2.0). We hypothesized that the PROMIS UE CAT v2.0 would exhibit improved performance characteristics compared with the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) when administered to a nonshoulder upper extremity patient population.

methodsThe UE CAT v2.0, Physical Function (PF) CAT v2.0, and the QuickDASH were each prospectively administered via tablet computer to all patients presenting to a tertiary hand and upper extremity clinic between April 2017 and October 2017. Patient responses were analyzed, and the mean, range, floor and ceiling effect, and correlations between instruments were calculated.

resultsAmong 825 patients, the mean UE CAT v2.0 score was 38.3 (SD 10.7) with a range of 15 to 61 and interquartile range of 15.4. The UE CAT v2.0 had a strong correlation with the QuickDASH (r = -0.749) and the PF CAT v2.0 (r = 0.719). No patient scored between 56 and 60, indicating a gap in scoring in that range. The UE CAT v2.0 demonstrated a floor effect of 1%, a ceiling effect of 6.9%, and a high internal consistency with a Cronbach alpha of 0.99.

conclusionsThe PROMIS UE CAT v2.0 demonstrated improved ceiling effects, range, and a decreased gap in scoring compared with prior versions. Limitations of the PROMIS UE CAT v2.0 are still present, but updates have led to an incremental improvement over prior versions, demonstrating the ability to influence PROMIS instrument performance through upgrades. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The updated PROMIS UE CAT v2.0 still demonstrates a ceiling effect and gap in scores at the upper end of the instrument, both of which may limit discrimination between different levels of upper extremity function for high-functioning patients.

Indexed as

Disability EvaluationPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresComputers, HandheldFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSoftwareUpper ExtremityComputerized adaptive testPatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)physical functionQuickDASH (qDASH)upper extremity

Identifiers

PMID30819409
PMCPMC6450736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.