Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30819214›Full record

ArticleItalian journal of pediatrics2019

Can we still do something-and what?-for a seemingly missing syndrome?

Rita Campi, Maurizio Bonati

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Italian journal of pediatrics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rita CampiLaboratory for Mother and Child Health, Department of Public Health, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri-IRCCS, Via Giuseppe La Masa 19, 20156, Milan, Italy.
Maurizio BonatiLaboratory for Mother and Child Health, Department of Public Health, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri-IRCCS, Via Giuseppe La Masa 19, 20156, Milan, Italy. maurizio.bonati@marionegri.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3997-3726
Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough several modifiable risk factors have been identified, and prone and side sleep positions were identified as preventing sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), the epidemiology of sudden unexpected deaths in infancy (SUDI), which includes SIDS, has not unchanged in over a decade. What can be done?

methodsItalian infant mortality rates were analysed between 1996 and 2015.

resultsBetween 1996 and 2015 in Italy 1152 SUDI deaths were reported in infants less than one year old. SUDI decreased substantially from 18 in 1996 to 10.2 deaths per hundred live births in 2015 (- 43%), the contribution was the change in the SIDS rate from 11.3 to 4.1 (- 64%). However, since 1004 main and SIDS rates have not changed.

conclusionInterventions that support safe sleep must be maintained, but research is still needed since although these dramatic deaths have been reduced their causes remain unknown. The challenge is now to shift their trend which has been constant for too long.

Indexed as

FemaleHumansInfantInfant MortalityInfant, NewbornItalyMaleRisk FactorsSudden Infant DeathSyndromeInfant mortalityItalySudden infant death syndromeSudden unexpected deaths in infancy

Identifiers

PMID30819214
PMCPMC6394045
OpenAlexW2943565297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.