Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30819166›Full record

SynthesisBMC pulmonary medicine2019

The economic burden of bronchiectasis - known and unknown: a systematic review.

Pieter C Goeminne, Francisco Hernandez, Roland Diel, Anna Filonenko, Rowena Hughes, Fabian Juelich, George M Solomon, Alex Upton, Kamonthip Wichmann, Weiwei Xu and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. The dipeptidyl peptidase 1 inhibition landscape in bronchiectasis and its future direction.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. ERJ open research · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A Novel Medical Device for Airway Clearance.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Biomarkers in bronchiectasis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024
    Review
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Pieter C GoeminneDepartment of Respiratory Diseases, AZ Nikolaas, Sint-Niklaas, Belgium and Department of Respiratory Diseases, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Francisco HernandezPharmerit, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Roland DielInstitute of Epidemiology, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Anna FilonenkoBayer AG, Berlin, Germany.
Rowena HughesAccuScript Consultancy, Reading, UK.
Fabian JuelichBayer Vital GmbH, Leverkusen, Germany.
George M SolomonUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Alex UptonBayer, Reading, UK.
Kamonthip WichmannBayer AG, Berlin, Germany.
Weiwei XuPharmerit, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
James D ChalmersScottish Centre for Respiratory Research, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK. j.chalmers@dundee.ac.uk.
Bayer (Germany) · DEPharmerit (Netherlands) · NLBayer (United Kingdom) · GBUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Dundee · GBUniversity of Lübeck · DEVlaamse Vereniging voor Obstetrie en Gynaecolo · BE

Funding

Functional Categorization of Ciliary Motion in PCDK08HL138153 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI SOLOMON, GEORGE MARTIN · 2019 to 2023
$799k
NHLBI NIH HHS K08 HL138153
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe increasing prevalence and recognition of bronchiectasis in clinical practice necessitates a better understanding of the economic disease burden to improve the management and achieve better clinical and economic outcomes. This study aimed to assess the economic burden of bronchiectasis based on a review of published literature.

methodsA systematic literature review was conducted using MEDLINE, Embase, EconLit and Cochrane databases to identify publications (1 January 2001 to 31 December 2016) on the economic burden of bronchiectasis in adults.

resultsA total of 26 publications were identified that reported resource use and costs associated with management of bronchiectasis. Two US studies reported annual incremental costs of bronchiectasis versus matched controls of US$5681 and US$2319 per patient. Twenty-four studies reported on hospitalization rates or duration of hospitalization for patients with bronchiectasis. Mean annual hospitalization rates per patient, reported in six studies, ranged from 0.3-1.3, while mean annual age-adjusted hospitalization rates, reported in four studies, ranged from 1.8-25.7 per 100,000 population. The average duration of hospitalization, reported in 12 studies, ranged from 2 to 17 days. Eight publications reported management costs of bronchiectasis. Total annual management costs of €3515 and €4672 per patient were reported in two Spanish studies. Two US studies reported total costs of approximately US$26,000 in patients without exacerbations, increasing to US$36,00-37,000 in patients with exacerbations. Similarly, a Spanish study reported higher total annual costs for patients with > 2 exacerbations per year (€7520) compared with those without exacerbations (€3892). P. aeruginosa infection increased management costs by US$31,551 to US$56,499, as reported in two US studies, with hospitalization being the main cost driver.

conclusionsThe current literature suggests that the economic burden of bronchiectasis in society is significant. Hospitalization costs are the major driver behind these costs, especially in patients with frequent exacerbations. However, the true economic burden of bronchiectasis is likely to be underestimated because most studies were retrospective, used ICD-9-CM coding to identify patients, and often ignored outpatient burden and cost. We present a conceptual framework to facilitate a more comprehensive assessment of the true burden of bronchiectasis for individuals, healthcare systems and society.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessBronchiectasisHealth Care CostsHealth ResourcesHospitalizationHumansSpainUnited StatesBronchiectasisBurden of illnessCostsEconomic burdenHospitalizationResource use

Identifiers

PMID30819166
PMCPMC6393984
OpenAlexW2919654984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.