Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30819159›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2019

Paediatric vision screening by non-healthcare volunteers: evidence based practices.

K Sabri, B Easterbrook, N Khosla, C Davis, F Farrokhyar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

K SabriDivision of Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, 1200 Main Street West, 3V2, Hamilton, ON, L8N 3Z5, Canada. sabrik@mcmaster.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7565-287X
B EasterbrookMcMaster Pediatric Surgery Research Collaborative, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8N 3Z5, Canada.
N KhoslaDivision of Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, 1200 Main Street West, 3V2, Hamilton, ON, L8N 3Z5, Canada.
C DavisHamilton-Wentworth Catholic District School Board, 90 Mulberry Street, P.O. Box 2012, Hamilton, ON, L8N 3R9, Canada.
F FarrokhyarOffice of Surgical Research Services, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, 39 Charlton Avenue East, Hamilton, ON, L8N 1Y3, Canada.
McMaster University · CASurgical Specialties (Canada) · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of this study was to test the sensitivity and specificity of eight undergraduate volunteer examiners conducting vision screening tests in a community setting, in order to determine if non-eye care professionals were able to be trained to an appropriate level of skill.

methodsEight undergraduate volunteer examiners were trained to conduct vision screening tests to address a gap in pediatric community eye care. Phase I of the study was implemented in the pediatric ophthalmology clinic, and phase II was conducted in nine local schools. Phase I consisted of 40 h of training for each volunteer regarding specific vision tests. Phase II consisted of screening children at nine local schools.

resultsA total of 690 children from nine local schools were screened by both the volunteer examiners and the optometrist during the course of this study. Volunteer examiners had a screening sensitivity of 0.80 (95%CI 0.66-0.90) and screening specificity of 0.75 (95%CI 0.71-0.78) when compared to the study optometrist. The overall accuracy of volunteer examiners was 75%. The resulting positive likelihood ratio was 3.24 (95%CI 2.6-3.9), indicating that a child with vision impairment was 3.2 times more likely to fail the vision test performed by the volunteer examiners compared to a child with no vision impairment.

conclusionsNon-healthcare professionals can be trained to an acceptable degree of accuracy to perform vision screening tests on children, which may assist in mitigating existing gaps in paediatric eye care.

Indexed as

PediatricsSchool Health ServicesStudentsAdolescentAllied Health PersonnelChildChild, PreschoolClinical CompetenceEvidence-Based PracticeFemaleHumansMaleOptometryPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsOphthalmologyPaediatricsQuantitative research MethodsTesting/assessment

Identifiers

PMID30819159
PMCPMC6394097
OpenAlexW2940941266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.