Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30819145›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2019

Effects of a motivational, individual and locally anchored exercise intervention (MILE) on cardiorespiratory fitness: a community-based randomised controlled trial.

Kirstine Høj Obling, Kristian Overgaard, Lise Juul, Helle Terkildsen Maindal

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01801956 (The MILE Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01801956 naunknown statusnot on this map

The MILE Study: A Motivational, Individual and Locally Anchored Exercise Intervention Among 30-49 Year-olds With Low Levels of Cardiorespiratory Fitness. A Randomised Controlled Study in Primary Care.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of AarhusRan2013 to 2016Enrolled240ConditionsPhysical ActivityArmsphysical activity, Motivational interview, Virtual arena
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kirstine Høj OblingDepartment of Public Health, Section for Health Promotion and Health Services, Aarhus University, Bartholins Allé 2, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark. kirstineobling@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9430-0781
Kristian OvergaardDepartment of Public Health, Section for Sport Science, Aarhus University, Dalgas Avenue 4, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Lise JuulDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Danish Center for Mindfulness, Aarhus University, Jens Chr. Skous Vej 4, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Helle Terkildsen MaindalDepartment of Public Health, Section for Health Promotion and Health Services, Aarhus University, Bartholins Allé 2, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.

Funding

Central Denmark Region 1-30-72-141-12Central Denmark Region 1-30-72-159-08L.F. Foghts Foundation 3723078416The Heart Foundation 14-R97-A5251-22810The Tryg Foundation 7-11-0500
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRisk factors for chronic disease, including low cardiorespiratory fitness levels (VO

methods232 adult volunteers with low VO

resultsNo significant between-group differences in primary or secondary outcomes were found at twelve months' follow-up. The mean VO

conclusionOffering a multi-component physical activity intervention to 30-49 year-olds with low levels of VO

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov (no. NCT01801956 ). Registered 1 March 2013.

Indexed as

MotivationAdultCardiorespiratory FitnessChronic DiseaseExerciseExercise TherapyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeAccelerometryCommunityMaximal ergometer bicycle testPhysical activityRandomised explanatory design

Identifiers

PMID30819145
PMCPMC6393962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.