Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30819097›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2019

Developing an Intervention for Fall-Related Injuries in Dementia (DIFRID): an integrated, mixed-methods approach.

Alison Wheatley, Claire Bamford, Caroline Shaw, Elizabeth Flynn, Amy Smith, Fiona Beyer, Chris Fox, Robert Barber, Steve W Parry, Denise Howel and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Alison WheatleyInstitute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, England.
Claire BamfordInstitute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, England.
Caroline ShawInstitute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, England.
Elizabeth FlynnThe Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, England.
Amy SmithTees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Darlington, England.
Fiona BeyerInstitute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, England.
Chris FoxUniversity of East Anglia, Norwich, England.
Robert BarberNorthumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, England.
Steve W ParryNewcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, England.
Denise HowelInstitute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, England.
Tara HomerInstitute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, England.
Louise RobinsonInstitute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, England.
Louise M AllanInstitute of Health Research, University of Exeter, South Cloisters, St Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, England. l.allan@exeter.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-8912-4901
Newcastle University · GBCumbria Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust · GBNewcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBTees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of East Anglia · GBUniversity of Exeter · GB

Funding

Department of Health HTA/13/78/02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFalls in people with dementia can result in a number of physical and psychosocial consequences. However, there is limited evidence to inform how best to deliver services to people with dementia following a fall. The aim of the DIFRID study was to determine the feasibility of developing and implementing a new intervention to improve outcomes for people with dementia with fall-related injuries; this encompasses both short-term recovery and reducing the likelihood of future falls. This paper details the development of the DIFRID intervention.

methodsThe intervention was designed using an integrated, mixed-methods approach. This involved a realist synthesis of the literature and qualitative data gathered through interviews and focus groups with health and social care professionals (n = 81). An effectiveness review and further interviews and observation were also conducted and are reported elsewhere. A modified Delphi panel approach with 24 experts was then used to establish a consensus on how the findings should translate into a new intervention. After feedback from key stakeholders (n = 15) on the proposed model, the intervention was manualised and training developed.

resultsWe identified key components of a new intervention covering three broad areas: • Ensuring that the circumstances of rehabilitation are optimised for people with dementia • Compensating for the reduced ability of people with dementia to self-manage • Equipping the workforce with the necessary skills and information to care for this patient group Consensus was achieved on 54 of 69 statements over two rounds of the Delphi surveys. The statements were used to model the intervention and finalise the accompanying manual and protocol for a feasibility study. Stakeholder feedback was generally positive and the majority of suggested intervention components were approved. The proposed outcome was a 12-week complex multidisciplinary intervention primarily based at the patient's home.

conclusionsA new intervention has been developed to improve outcomes for people with dementia following a fall requiring healthcare attention. The feasibility of this intervention is currently being tested.

trial registrationISRCTN41760734 (16/11/2015).

Indexed as

Accidental FallsConsensusDelphi TechniqueDementiaEarly Medical InterventionFeasibility StudiesFocus GroupsHumansSelf-ManagementSurveys and QuestionnairesDelphi consensusDementiaFallsIntervention developmentRealist synthesis

Identifiers

PMID30819097
PMCPMC6394022
OpenAlexW2920823424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.