Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30819090›Full record

Trial reportBMC bioinformatics2019

Predicting blood pressure from physiological index data using the SVR algorithm.

Bing Zhang, Huihui Ren, Guoyan Huang, Yongqiang Cheng, Changzhen Hu

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Survey and Evaluation of Hypertension Machine Learning Research.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bing ZhangSchool of Information Science and Engineering, Yanshan University, Hebei Avenue, Qinhuangdao, 066004, China.
Huihui RenSchool of Information Science and Engineering, Yanshan University, Hebei Avenue, Qinhuangdao, 066004, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9747-3255
Guoyan HuangSchool of Information Science and Engineering, Yanshan University, Hebei Avenue, Qinhuangdao, 066004, China. hgy@ysu.edu.cn.
Yongqiang ChengDepartment of Computer Science and Technology, University of Hull, Hull, HU6 7RX, UK.
Changzhen HuBeijing Key Laboratory of Software Security Engineering Technique, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, 100081, China.

Funding

National Key R&D Program of China 2016YFB0800700National Natural Science Foundation of China 61472341National Natural Science Foundation of China 61572420National Natural Science Foundation of China 61772449National Natural Science Foundation of China 61772451National Natural Science Foundation of China 61802332National Natural Science Foundation of China 61807028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBlood pressure diseases have increasingly been identified as among the main factors threatening human health. How to accurately and conveniently measure blood pressure is the key to the implementation of effective prevention and control measures for blood pressure diseases. Traditional blood pressure measurement methods exhibit many inherent disadvantages, for example, the time needed for each measurement is difficult to determine, continuous measurement causes discomfort, and the measurement process is relatively cumbersome. Wearable devices that enable continuous measurement of blood pressure provide new opportunities and hopes. Although machine learning methods for blood pressure prediction have been studied, the accuracy of the results does not satisfy the needs of practical applications.

resultsThis paper proposes an efficient blood pressure prediction method based on the support vector machine regression (SVR) algorithm to solve the key gap between the need for continuous measurement for prophylaxis and the lack of an effective method for continuous measurement. The results of the algorithm were compared with those obtained from two classical machine learning algorithms, i.e., linear regression (LinearR), back propagation neural network (BP), with respect to six evaluation indexes (accuracy, pass rate, mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), mean absolute error (MAE), R-squared coefficient of determination (R

conclusionThe multi-feature joint training and predicting techniques in machine learning can potentially complement and greatly improve the accuracy of traditional blood pressure measurement, resulting in better disease classification and more accurate clinical judgements.

Indexed as

Support Vector MachineAdultBlood PressureFemaleHumansLinear ModelsMachine LearningMaleNeural Networks, ComputerBlood pressure predictionPhysiological index dataSVR

Identifiers

PMID30819090
PMCPMC6396542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.