Trial reportBMC bioinformatics2019
Predicting blood pressure from physiological index data using the SVR algorithm.
Trial report in BMC bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- A Novel Method for Cardiac Output and Vascular Parameters Estimation Using Peripheral Arterial Waveforms: Integrating Windkessel Model viaAnnals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Wearable blood pressure sensors for cardiovascular monitoring and machine learning algorithms for blood pressure estimation.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2025Review
- Transforming Healthcare: Intelligent Wearable Sensors Empowered by Smart Materials and Artificial Intelligence.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025Review
- Accurate Estimation of Methemoglobin and Oxygen Saturation in Skin Tissue Using Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy and Artificial Intelligence.Journal of biophotonics · 2025Article
- Predictive modeling of biomedical temporal data in healthcare applications: review and future directions.Frontiers in physiology · 2024Review
- Study on the relationship between body mass index and blood pressure indices in children aged 7-17 during COVID-19.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Hypothesis Scoring for Confidence-Aware Blood Pressure Estimation With Particle Filters.IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics · 2023Article
- Survey and Evaluation of Hypertension Machine Learning Research.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Article
- Hybrid CNN-SVR Blood Pressure Estimation Model Using ECG and PPG Signals.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Advancement in the Cuffless and Noninvasive Measurement of Blood Pressure: A Review of the Literature and Open Challenges.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Empirical analyses and simulations showed that different machine and statistical learning methods had differing performance for predicting blood pressure.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- A novel method of trans-esophageal Doppler cardiac output monitoring utilizing peripheral arterial pulse contour with/without machine learning approach.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2022Article
- Soft Transducer for Patient's Vitals Telemonitoring with Deep Learning-Based Personalized Anomaly Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Imputation of the continuous arterial line blood pressure waveform from non-invasive measurements using deep learning.Scientific reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBlood pressure diseases have increasingly been identified as among the main factors threatening human health. How to accurately and conveniently measure blood pressure is the key to the implementation of effective prevention and control measures for blood pressure diseases. Traditional blood pressure measurement methods exhibit many inherent disadvantages, for example, the time needed for each measurement is difficult to determine, continuous measurement causes discomfort, and the measurement process is relatively cumbersome. Wearable devices that enable continuous measurement of blood pressure provide new opportunities and hopes. Although machine learning methods for blood pressure prediction have been studied, the accuracy of the results does not satisfy the needs of practical applications.
resultsThis paper proposes an efficient blood pressure prediction method based on the support vector machine regression (SVR) algorithm to solve the key gap between the need for continuous measurement for prophylaxis and the lack of an effective method for continuous measurement. The results of the algorithm were compared with those obtained from two classical machine learning algorithms, i.e., linear regression (LinearR), back propagation neural network (BP), with respect to six evaluation indexes (accuracy, pass rate, mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), mean absolute error (MAE), R-squared coefficient of determination (R
conclusionThe multi-feature joint training and predicting techniques in machine learning can potentially complement and greatly improve the accuracy of traditional blood pressure measurement, resulting in better disease classification and more accurate clinical judgements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.