Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30818842›Full record

ReviewBrain sciences2019

Haemodynamic Instability and Brain Injury in Neonates Exposed to Hypoxia⁻Ischaemia.

Shiraz Badurdeen, Calum Roberts, Douglas Blank, Suzanne Miller, Vanesa Stojanovska, Peter Davis, Stuart Hooper, Graeme Polglase

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Cardiovascular responses to mild perinatal asphyxia in growth-restricted preterm lambs.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shiraz BadurdeenThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Monash University, Melbourne 3168, Australia. sb470@doctors.org.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-3362-6435
Calum RobertsThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Monash University, Melbourne 3168, Australia. calum.roberts@monash.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9111-5027
Douglas BlankThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Monash University, Melbourne 3168, Australia. Douglas.Blank@monashhealth.org.
Suzanne MillerThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Monash University, Melbourne 3168, Australia. suzie.miller@monash.edu.
Vanesa StojanovskaThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Monash University, Melbourne 3168, Australia. vanesa.stojanovska@hudson.org.au.
Peter DavisNewborn Research Centre, The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne 3052, Australia. pgd@unimelb.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-6742-7314
Stuart HooperThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Monash University, Melbourne 3168, Australia. stuart.hooper@monash.edu.
Graeme PolglaseThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Monash University, Melbourne 3168, Australia. graeme.polglase@monash.edu.
Hudson Institute of Medical Research · AURoyal Women's Hospital · AU

Funding

Australian Government Research Training Program 000000National Health and Medical Research Council 1105526
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain injury in the asphyxic newborn infant may be exacerbated by delayed restoration of cardiac output and oxygen delivery. With increasing severity of asphyxia, cerebral autoregulatory responses are compromised. Further brain injury may occur in association with high arterial pressures and cerebral blood flows following the restoration of cardiac output. Initial resuscitation aims to rapidly restore cardiac output and oxygenation whilst mitigating the impact of impaired cerebral autoregulation. Recent animal studies have indicated that the current standard practice of immediate umbilical cord clamping prior to resuscitation may exacerbate injury. Resuscitation prior to umbilical cord clamping confers several haemodynamic advantages. In particular, it retains the low-resistance placental circuit that mitigates the rebound hypertension and cerebrovascular injury. Prolonged cerebral hypoxia⁻ischaemia is likely to contribute to further perinatal brain injury, while, at the same time, tissue hyperoxia is associated with oxidative stress. Efforts to monitor and target cerebral flow and oxygen kinetics, for example, using near-infrared spectroscopy, are currently being evaluated and may facilitate development of novel resuscitation approaches.

Indexed as

asphyxiacord clampinghaemodynamichypoxic–ischaemic encephalopathyneonateoxygen

Identifiers

PMID30818842
PMCPMC6468566
OpenAlexW2915799812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.