Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30818741›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2019

Extensive Reliability Evaluation of Docking-Based Target-Fishing Strategies.

Margherita Lapillo, Tiziano Tuccinardi, Adriano Martinelli, Marco Macchia, Antonio Giordano, Giulio Poli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Art and Science of Molecular Docking.Annual review of biochemistry · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Drug repositioning: A bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022
    Review
  7. Recent Advances in In Silico Target Fishing.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Molecular Docking: Shifting Paradigms in Drug Discovery.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Margherita LapilloDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy. margherita.lapillo@farm.unipi.it.
Tiziano TuccinardiDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy. tiziano.tuccinardi@unipi.it.ORCID 0000-0002-6205-4069
Adriano MartinelliDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy. adriano.martinelli@unipi.it.ORCID 0000-0002-7197-0552
Marco MacchiaDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy. marco.macchia@unipi.it.
Antonio GiordanoSbarro Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Center for Biotechnology, College of Science and Technology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA. giordano@temple.edu.
Giulio PoliDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy. giulio.poli@unipi.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of target-fishing approaches, aimed at identifying the possible protein targets of a small molecule, represents a hot topic in medicinal chemistry. A successful target-fishing approach would allow for the elucidation of the mechanism of action of all therapeutically interesting compounds for which the actual target is still unknown. Moreover, target-fishing would be essential for preventing adverse effects of drug candidates, by predicting their potential off-targets, and it would speed up drug repurposing campaigns. However, due to the huge number of possible protein targets that a small-molecule might interact with, experimental target-fishing approaches are out of reach. In silico target-fishing represents a valuable alternative, and examples of receptor-based approaches, exploiting the large number of crystallographic protein structures determined to date, have been reported in the literature. To the best of our knowledge, no proper evaluation of such approaches is, however, reported yet. In the present work, we extensively assessed the reliability of docking-based target-fishing strategies. For this purpose, a set of X-ray structures belonging to different targets was selected, and a dataset of compounds, including 10 experimentally active ligands for each target, was created. A target-fishing benchmark database was then obtained, and used to assess the performance of 13 different docking procedures, in identifying the correct target of the dataset ligands. Moreover, a consensus docking-based target-fishing strategy was developed and evaluated. The analysis highlighted that specific features of the target proteins could affect the reliability of the protocol, which however, proved to represent a valuable tool in the proper applicability domain. Our study represents the first extensive performance assessment of docking-based target-fishing approaches, paving the way for the development of novel efficient receptor-based target fishing strategies.

Indexed as

Molecular Docking SimulationBinding SitesDatabases, ChemicalLigandsProteinsReproducibility of ResultsLigandsProteinsconsensus dockingdockingreverse screeningtarget fishing

Identifiers

PMID30818741
PMCPMC6429110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.