ArticlePloS one2019
Attention and speech-processing related functional brain networks activated in a multi-speaker environment.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neural synchrony and cognitive map formulation in collaborative navigation: leader-follower couplings revealed by EEG hyperscanning.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2026Article
- Time-of-Day Variations and Effects of Total Sleep Deprivation on Attention Assessed with the Attentional Demands Task.Clocks & sleep · 2026Article
- A BIO-EEG Hyperscanning Study of Moral Dyadic Negotiation.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Converging Minds: EEG Synchrony During Communication About Moral Decision-Making in Dyadic Interactions.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A preliminary EEG study on persuasive communication towards groupness.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The Role of Emotion Regulation and Awareness in Psychosocial Stress: An EEG-Psychometric Correlational Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- The effects of spatial leakage correction on the reliability of EEG-based functional connectivity networks.Human brain mapping · 2024Article
- Attention to audiovisual speech shapes neural processing through feedback-feedforward loops between different nodes of the speech network.PLoS biology · 2024Article
- Who is WithMe? EEG features for attention in a visual task, with auditory and rhythmic support.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
- Age-Related Changes to Multisensory Integration and Audiovisual Speech Perception.Brain sciences · 2023Review
- Article
- Neuronal Correlates of Informational and Energetic Masking in the Human Brain in a Multi-Talker Situation.Frontiers in psychology · 2019Article
- Can youImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human listeners can focus on one speech stream out of several concurrent ones. The present study aimed to assess the whole-brain functional networks underlying a) the process of focusing attention on a single speech stream vs. dividing attention between two streams and 2) speech processing on different time-scales and depth. Two spoken narratives were presented simultaneously while listeners were instructed to a) track and memorize the contents of a speech stream and b) detect the presence of numerals or syntactic violations in the same ("focused attended condition") or in the parallel stream ("divided attended condition"). Speech content tracking was found to be associated with stronger connectivity in lower frequency bands (delta band- 0,5-4 Hz), whereas the detection tasks were linked with networks operating in the faster alpha (8-10 Hz) and beta (13-30 Hz) bands. These results suggest that the oscillation frequencies of the dominant brain networks during speech processing may be related to the duration of the time window within which information is integrated. We also found that focusing attention on a single speaker compared to dividing attention between two concurrent speakers was predominantly associated with connections involving the frontal cortices in the delta (0.5-4 Hz), alpha (8-10 Hz), and beta bands (13-30 Hz), whereas dividing attention between two parallel speech streams was linked with stronger connectivity involving the parietal cortices in the delta and beta frequency bands. Overall, connections strengthened by focused attention may reflect control over information selection, whereas connections strengthened by divided attention may reflect the need for maintaining two streams in parallel and the related control processes necessary for performing the tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.