Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30818335›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Dynamic changes in lung responses after single and repeated exposures to cigarette smoke in mice.

Michelle L Engle, Justine N Monk, Corey M Jania, Jessica R Martin, John C Gomez, Hong Dang, Joel S Parker, Claire M Doerschuk

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michelle L EngleMarsico Lung Institute, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.
Justine N MonkMarsico Lung Institute, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.
Corey M JaniaMarsico Lung Institute, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.
Jessica R MartinMarsico Lung Institute, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1145-2235
John C GomezMarsico Lung Institute, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.
Hong DangMarsico Lung Institute, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.
Joel S ParkerDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.
Claire M DoerschukMarsico Lung Institute, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2638-3321
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USLung Institute · US

Funding

UNC-CH CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH &SUSCEPTIBILITYP30ES010126 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Hazel B Nichols · 2001 to 2026
$36.3M
The Impact of Tobacco Exposure on the Lungs Innate Defense SystemP50HL120100 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI TARRAN, ROBERT · 2013 to 2017
$21.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS P50 HL120100NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES010126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cigarette smoke is well recognized to cause injury to the airways and the alveolar walls over time. This injury usually requires many years of exposure, suggesting that the lungs may rapidly develop responses that initially protect it from this repetitive injury. Our studies tested the hypotheses that smoke induces an inflammatory response and changes in mRNA profiles that are dependent on sex and the health status of the lung, and that the response of the lungs to smoke differs after 1 day compared to 5 days of exposure. Male and female wildtype (WT) and Scnn1b-transgenic (βENaC) mice, which have chronic bronchitis and emphysematous changes due to dehydrated mucus, were exposed to cigarette smoke or sham air conditions for 1 or 5 days. The inflammatory response and gene expression profiles were analyzed in lung tissue. Overall, the inflammatory response to cigarette smoke was mild, and changes in mediators were more numerous after 1 than 5 days. βENaC mice had more airspace leukocytes than WT mice, and smoke exposure resulted in additional significant alterations. Many genes and gene sets responded similarly at 1 and 5 days: genes involved in oxidative stress responses were upregulated while immune response genes were downregulated. However, certain genes and biological processes were regulated differently after 1 compared to 5 days. Extracellular matrix biology genes and gene sets were upregulated after 1 day but downregulated by 5 days of smoke compared to sham exposure. There was no difference in the transcriptional response to smoke between WT and βENaC mice or between male and female mice at either 1 or 5 days. Taken together, these studies suggest that the lungs rapidly alter gene expression after only one exposure to cigarette smoke, with few additional changes after four additional days of repeated exposure. These changes may contribute to preventing lung damage.

Indexed as

AnimalsBronchitis, ChronicBronchoalveolar Lavage FluidDisease Models, AnimalEmphysemaEpithelial Sodium ChannelsFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationHumansLungMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicNicotianaEpithelial Sodium ChannelsScnn1b protein, mouseSmoke

Identifiers

PMID30818335
PMCPMC6395068
OpenAlexW2920077026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.