Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30818311›Full record

Trial reportMedicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal2019

Effectiveness of a spray containing 1% malic acid in patients with xerostomia induced by graft-versus-host disease.

E Bardellini, F Amadori, G Conti, F Veneri, A Majorana

Open access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Oral manifestations of graft-versus-host disease in patients submitted to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: the experience of a Brazilian Cancer Center.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

E BardelliniDental Clinic, p.le Spedali Civili n.1, 25133 Brescia,Italy, elena.bardellini@unibs.it.
F Amadori
G Conti
F Veneri
A Majorana
University of Brescia · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo evaluate the clinical effectiveness of a topical sialogogue spray (malic acid, 1%) in the treatment of xerostomia in patients with chronic Graft versus Host Disease (cGVHD). MATERIAL AND

methodsThis study was designed as a randomized double-blind clinical study. Twenty-eight patients with cGVHD suffering from xerostomia were divided into 2 groups: the first group (14 patients) received a topical sialagogue spray containing malic acid 1% (SalivAktive®) whereas the second group (14 patients) received a placebo. Both groups received treatment for 2 weeks. Dry Mouth Questionnaire (DMQ) scores and unstimulated salivary flows rate were collected before and after treatment.

resultsDMQ scores increased significantly from 1.3 ± 0.4 to 3.5 ± 0.4 points (p<0.05) after two weeks of treatment with malic acid, whereas in the control group DMQ scores increased from 1.2 ± 0.7 points to 1.4 ± 0.6 (p>0.05). The unstimulated salivary flow rate in patients treated with malic acid increased significantly from 0.15 ± 0.06 mL/min to 0.24± 0.08 mL/min, while that of the patients treated with placebo went from 0.16 ± 0.07 mL/min to 0.17 ± 0.09 mL/min (p>0.05).

conclusionsMalic acid 1% spray can be considered effective in the treatment of GVHD induced xerostomia.

Indexed as

Oral SpraysAdultDouble-Blind MethodFemaleGraft vs Host DiseaseHumansMalatesMaleMiddle AgedSalivaSalivationSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeXerostomiaMalatesmalic acidOral Sprays

Identifiers

PMID30818311
PMCPMC6441605
OpenAlexW2920161918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.