Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30818309›Full record

ReviewMedicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal2019

Therapeutic tools for oral candidiasis: Current and new antifungal drugs.

G Quindós, S Gil-Alonso, C Marcos-Arias, E Sevillano, E Mateo, N Jauregizar, E Eraso

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 91 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
91citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
11.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

91 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 176 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Gold Nanoparticles Coated With the Antimicrobial Peptide Os-C(W5): Anticandidal and Biological Activity.Journal of peptide science : an official publication of the European Peptide Society · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Molecular mechanisms, pathogenesis and therapeutic advances ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Antifungal Effects of Pterostilbene onJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  20. Review

31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

G QuindósDepartamento de Inmunología, Microbiología y Parasitología, Facultad de Medicina y Enfermería, Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea (UPV/EHU), Apartado 699, 48080 Bilbao, (Spain), Guillermo.Quindos@ehu.eus.
S Gil-Alonso
C Marcos-Arias
E Sevillano
E Mateo
N Jauregizar
E Eraso
University of the Basque Country · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCandidiasis is one of the most common opportunistic oral infections that presents different acute and chronic clinical presentations with diverse diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. The present study carries out a bibliographic review on the therapeutic tools available against oral candidiasis and their usefulness in each clinical situation. MATERIAL AND

methodsRecent studies on treatment of oral candidiasis were retrieved from PubMed and Cochrane Library.

resultsNystatin and miconazole are the most commonly used topical antifungal drugs. Both antifungal drugs are very effective but need a long time of use to eradicate the infection. The pharmacological presentations of miconazole are more comfortable for patients but this drug may interact with other drugs and this fact should be assessed before use. Other topical alternatives for oral candidiasis, such as amphotericin B or clotrimazole, are not available in many countries. Oral fluconazole is effective in treating oral candidiasis that does not respond to topical treatment. Other systemic treatment alternatives, oral or intravenous, less used are itraconazole, voriconazole or posaconazole. Available novelties include echinocandins (anidulafungin, caspofungin) and isavuconazole. Echinocandins can only be used intravenously. Isavuconazole is available for oral and intravenous use. Other hopeful alternatives are new drugs, such as ibrexafungerp, or the use of antibodies, cytokines and antimicrobial peptides.

conclusionsNystatin, miconazole, and fluconazole are very effective for treating oral candidiasis. There are systemic alternatives for treating recalcitrant infections, such as the new triazoles, echinocandins, or lipidic presentations of amphotericin B.

Indexed as

Administration, IntravenousAdministration, OralAdministration, TopicalAmphotericin BAnidulafunginAntifungal AgentsAzolesCandidiasis, OralCaspofunginClotrimazoleDatabases, FactualDrug InteractionsEchinocandinsFluconazoleHumansMiconazoleAmphotericin BAnidulafunginAntifungal AgentsAzolesCaspofunginClotrimazoleEchinocandinsFluconazoleisavuconazoleMiconazoleNitrilesNystatinposaconazolePyridinesTriazoles

Identifiers

PMID30818309
PMCPMC6441600
OpenAlexW2920446683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.