Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30818303›Full record

ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2019

Automatic PET cervical tumor segmentation by combining deep learning and anatomic prior.

Liyuan Chen, Chenyang Shen, Zhiguo Zhou, Genevieve Maquilan, Kevin Albuquerque, Michael R Folkert, Jing Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. A radiogenomics study onBMC cancer · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Cervical cancer segmentation based on medical images: a literature review.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Article
  18. Segmentation of white matter hyperintensities onEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Liyuan ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75287, United States of America.
Chenyang ShenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75287, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6490-6555
Zhiguo ZhouDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75287, United States of America.
Genevieve MaquilanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75287, United States of America.
Kevin AlbuquerqueDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75287, United States of America.
Michael R FolkertDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75287, United States of America.
Jing WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75287, United States of America.

Funding

Next generation 4D-CBCT for lung cancer radiation therapyR01EB020366 · NIBIB · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI WANG, JING · 2015 to 2018
$1.4M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB020366
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical tumor segmentation on 3D

Indexed as

Deep LearningFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalUterine Cervical Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID30818303
PMCPMC7098064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.