Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30818200›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in structural biology2019

Photodimerization systems for regulating protein-protein interactions with light.

Jessica I Spiltoir, Chandra L Tucker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in structural biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Engineering Light-Control in Biology.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. A light way for nuclear cell biologists.Journal of biochemistry · 2021
    Review
  13. Visualization and Manipulation of Intracellular Signaling.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Review
  14. Lighting up single-mRNA translation dynamics in living cells.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jessica I SpiltoirDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Chandra L TuckerDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA. Electronic address: chandra.tucker@ucdenver.edu.

Funding

Control of Protein Activity Via Light Stimulated DimerizersR01GM100225 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI TUCKER, CHANDRA L · 2012 to 2019
$3.3M
Validating and extending optical tools for extended neural silencingUF1NS107710 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI FORD, CHRISTOPHER PETER, KENNEDY, MATTHEW J · 2018 to 2018
$2.0M
Optogenetic control of protein assemblyR21GM126253 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI TUCKER, CHANDRA L · 2017 to 2018
$428k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM100225NIGMS NIH HHS R21 GM126253NINDS NIH HHS UF1 NS107710
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optogenetic dimerizers are modular domains that can be utilized in a variety of versatile ways to modulate cellular biochemistry. Because of their modularity, many applications using these tools can be easily transferred to new targets without extensive engineering. While a number of photodimerizer systems are currently available, the field remains nascent, with new optimizations for existing systems and new approaches to regulating biological function continuing to be introduced at a steady pace.

Indexed as

LightProtein BindingProtein MultimerizationProteinsProtein Structure, QuaternaryProteins

Identifiers

PMID30818200
PMCPMC6697570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.